- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
Panel Debunks Powerline-Cancer Link
31 October 1996 8:00 pm
WASHINGTON--An expert panel has found no scientific reason to believe that electromagnetic fields from power lines, appliances, and other everyday sources cause cancer or other health effects. But some panel members argue that the heavily studied issue deserves further scrutiny.
The panel's report, released today by the National Research Council--part of the prestigious National Academy of Sciences--is expected to weaken further what many scientists feel is an already shaky case against the harmful effects of EMFs. Several population studies over the past 17 years have pointed to a weak link between EMF exposure in the home and certain cancers, particularly childhood leukemia, prompting widespread media coverage of the alleged problem. But similar studies have found no connection, and scientists have failed to propose a plausible biological mechanism to explain how EMFs might cause cancer.
The NRC panel, chaired by neurobiologist Charles Stevens of the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California, looked at more than 500 human, animal, and cellular studies on EMFs and found ``no conclusive and consistent evidence...that exposures to residential electric and magnetic fields produce cancer, adverse neurobehavioral effects, or reproductive and developmental effects.''As for what this means for the average person, says panel member Bruce Kelman of Golder Associates Inc. in Redmond, Washington, ``I would be much more worried'' about air pollution than EMFs.
The panel did not dismiss all EMF findings, however. After analyzing data on childhood leukemia, the panel found a 50% increase in this rare cancer in homes with a high estimated exposure to EMFs from nearby power lines. But these estimates correlate poorly with actual measured levels of EMF inside the home, the panel says. The panel suggests further studies to explore whether the elevated leukemia risk comes from some other hazard, such as air pollution.
Not all members of the panel, which was formed at the request of the Department of Energy, believe the report should close the book on EMFs. Three of the panel's 16 members issued a separate press release imploring people not to ignore potential EMF health effects. ``We don't think the matter is settled,'' says one of the signers, cell biologist Richard Luben of the University of California, Riverside, citing the leukemia studies and cellular and animal data. To many skeptics, however, the case is at least considerably weakened.