- News Home
27 November 2013 12:59 pm ,
Vol. 342 ,
The new head of the National Center for Science Education promises to "fight the good fight" against attacks on...
Analyses of the H7N9 strains isolated from four new cases show that the virus is evolving rapidly, heightening anxiety...
In 2009, Jack Szostak shared a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the role of telomeres, the end bits of...
Science has exposed a thriving academic black market in China involving shady agencies, corrupt scientists, and...
Paper-selling agencies flourish in the aura of reputable businesses. For some scientists, it may be difficult to tell...
Featuring the first lunar rover in 40 years, Chang'e-3 is seen as an important milestone on China's quest to send a...
Data collected by satellites and floating probes have chronicled a 2-decade rise in the temperature and thickness of a...
Cholesterol, the artery-clogging molecule that contributes to cardiovascular disease, has another nasty trick up its...
- 27 November 2013 12:59 pm , Vol. 342 , #6162
- About Us
Slow-Brained Night Owls
17 September 1997 8:00 pm
If you seem to have trouble thinking straight late at night, don't put all the blame on long hours of work or lack of sleep. According to a new study, your brain simply works slower in the wee hours. Published this week in the journal Sleep, the research suggests that the human biological clock slows down the brain's performance at night, exacerbating the mental wanderings that come from lack of sleep.
Most previous studies of human performance without sleep have focused on sleep deprivation. But Timothy Monk and Julie Carrier from the University of Pittsburgh wanted to find out whether circadian rhythms--the daily cycles that tell us when to wake and when to sleep--also affect the brain's information processing.
The researchers kept 18 participants awake in rooms without windows or clocks for 36 hours, and to remove the soporific effect of large meals, they gave the subjects hourly nutritional supplements. The subjects were tested every other hour with true-false questions phrased in both positive and negative voices, such as "C is before M--MC" and "M is not before C--MC." Although the negative-voiced questions always took longer to answer, the difference in answer times between the two question types yielded a "relatively pure measure of speed of thought" at different times throughout the study, says Monk. Any lack of attention or slowness in reactions would on average cause the same delays for both types of questions.
Although the subjects became progressively slower at the harder questions as the study wore on, they improved slightly the morning after the sleepless night. Monk and Carrier attribute this burst of sharper thinking to circadian rhythms, as the subjects' biological clocks were still active.
The study shows that it's not just sleep that night workers have to fight, says human chronobiologist Scott Campbell of Cornell University: "Just by running cold water on your arms and putting a cold rag on your head to try to make yourself feel transiently alert probably is not going to bring your performance back to daytime levels." But he cautions that the study isn't perfect: "It's still difficult, even in this protocol, to tease out the difference between sleep deprivation and the true circadian, time-of-day effect on performance."