- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
International Biosafety Talks Fail
25 February 1999 6:00 pm
Talks in Colombia to hammer out an international agreement controlling trade of bioengineered organisms broke down earlier this week, putting the protocol on hold with a goal of reaching an agreement by May 2000.
Representatives from 138 countries had met in Cartagena to work out a Biosafety Protocol, as called for by the 1992 United Nations Convention on Biodiversity. The protocol is supposed to protect countries from unwittingly importing transgenics that could harm their environment--for example, if a gene inserted in a crop to make it resistant to herbicides were to jump into a related weed. European and developing countries have felt that the protocol--which would require that exporters gain approval from a country before shipping products there--should extend not just to seeds but also to transgenic corn, soybeans, and other crops, because those commodities are sometimes used as seeds. But that proposal was anathema to a United States-led bloc, which feared it would strangle trade in transgenic foods.
Unable to bridge the gap, the talks ended on 23 February without an agreement. "The outcome is the right outcome," says Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Environment and Development Rafe Pomerance, who led the U.S. delegation. (The United States was an observer at the talks because it still hasn't ratified the 1992 treaty, but wielded considerable influence because it was allied with five other countries and treaty issues must be decided by consensus). "Better no protocol than a bad protocol, absolutely," Pomerance says. The environmental group Greenpeace says the U.S. deliberately hamstrung the talks. "They weren't interested in the agreement," says Charles Margulis of Greenpeace's Washington, D.C., office. Margulis says other countries were willing to give in and exclude commodities in exchange for other concessions, but the United States just wasn't talking.