- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
A Baby Album of the Universe
26 March 1999 2:00 pm
ATLANTA--Scientists have used a supercomputer to look at page one in the photo album of stars in the universe, and this is what they see: brilliant giants up to 100 times bigger than our sun. These stars began lighting up the cosmos about 50 million years after the big bang, according to research presented here this week at a meeting of the American Physical Society.
Astronomers have long wondered what the first objects in the universe looked like. Theories predict that after the big bang, gravity slowly pulled parts of the expanding gas into clumps, but the agreement ends there. Some models show the clumps coalescing into Jupiter-sized bodies or small dim stars. Others predict titanic stars or even black holes. Computer simulations--often used to model clusters of galaxies later in cosmic history--were little help, because they lacked the 3D resolution needed to track the collapse of myriad parcels of gas into small primordial clouds.
Now, a team led by cosmologist Michael Norman of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications in Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, has broken that barrier. The team used "adaptive mesh refinement," in which the program zooms in on developing clumps of gas and increases the resolution only in those areas. In this way, the researchers can follow the growth of a nebulous blob until it forms a tight knot ready to spawn a star. The simulation indicated that most such knots were a few hundred times more massive than our sun. Some fraction of that mass would collapse into stars, Norman says.
As a result, most of the stars were giants that lived fast and died young, consuming their nuclear fuel within a few million years. Then, they blew up and began seeding the cosmos with the heavy elements forged in their cores, such as carbon, oxygen, and iron. However, turbulence might have split some gas into small stars--perhaps even some tiny enough to survive to this day, Norman says. "That's a possibility, but we have every indication that most of the initial stars were massive," he notes.
"This is the best work that has been done on seeing the conditions that led to the formation of the first stars," says astrophysicist Jeremiah Ostriker of Princeton University in New Jersey. "The higher resolution allows them to follow the process in far greater detail, essentially to the stellar scale."