- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
Pusztai Fights Back With Royal Approval
14 June 1999 6:00 pm
Arpad Pusztai, the British scientist whose controversial studies triggered a furious debate over the safety of transgenic food but were criticized by a Royal Society committee, is fighting to save his reputation. Last weekend, he launched a Web site in an attempt to refute the committee's scathing conclusions.
Pusztai was suspended from his job at the Rowett Research Institute in Aberdeen, Scotland, last August, after saying in a TV documentary that transgenic potatoes could stunt rats' growth. Critics of genetic engineering seized on his words to prop up their case, and in February, an international group of scientists spoke out in his defense. But in May, six anonymous experts appointed by the Royal Society called the data "inadequate," because of flaws in the experiment's design and Pustzai's analysis (ScienceNOW, 18 May 1999).
On his new Web site, Pusztai responds by posting the entire text of the anonymous reviews, along with his own rebuttal and his correspondence with the Royal Society. He claims that the reviewers saw only internal documents that were prepared for study collaborators and didn't include details of experimental design or methodology; the material available to the panel wasn't fit, Pusztai claims, for the journal-style peer-review that the Royal Society undertook.
Meanwhile, the beleaguered scientist has an influential new defender. Last week, Pusztai met the Prince of Wales, who has recently become a leading voice in the British campaign against transgenic foods. According to Pusztai, Prince Charles told him he had been treated cruelly by the scientific establishment and deserved an apology. Charles's office refused to confirm the content of the meeting. "It's ironic" that royalty will step in when the government fails to respond to the wishes of its citizens, says Pusztai.