- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
Elephant Species Splits in Two
23 August 2001 7:00 pm
Elephants should be hard to miss. But scientists have apparently overlooked an entire species: In the 24 August issue of Science, a team of researchers shows that forest- and savanna-dwelling elephants, currently lumped together in a single species called Loxodonta africana, each merits its own species name.
For over a century, scientists have argued about the distinctiveness of forest elephants, shy creatures that are difficult to spot in their thick forest habitat. But those who have seen them point to unique features: Forest elephants are not only smaller than those on the savanna, but they also have straighter, thinner tusks and round, as opposed to pointed, ears. "If you see a forest elephant for the first time, you think, 'Wow, what is that?,'" says team member Nicholas Georgiadis, a biologist at the Mpala Research Center in Nanyuki, Kenya. Yet most biologists had assumed that the elephants readily mix on the edges of forests, and forest elephants were usually designated as a subspecies, Loxodonta africana cyclotis.
Over 8 years, Georgiadis used darts to collect tissue samples from 195 free-ranging elephants in 21 populations. He then teamed up with Alfred Roca and other researchers at the National Cancer Institute in Frederick, Maryland, who pegged the genetic distance between forest and savanna samples as more than half the distance between Asian and African elephants--long recognized as distinct genera. Only one population showed the type of genetic mixing that could come from interbreeding, and that apparently happened several generations ago, suggesting that crossbreeding is rare. The team now proposes two species names: Loxodonta africana for the savanna elephants and Loxodonta cyclotis for the forest dwellers.
"The morphological evidence has been very, very strong," says conservation biologist Samuel Wasser of the University of Washington, Seattle. "When you see the genetic data, it seems almost a no-brainer." The new genetic evidence has implications for conservation, says Georgiadis. Instead of assuming that there are 500,000 elephants in Africa, "there are many fewer than that of each kind, and they're both much more endangered than we presumed," he says. Researchers estimate up to one-third of African elephants live in forests.