- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
28 September 2001 7:00 pm
BARCELONA, SPAIN--Your experiment resulted in a cloud of data points. What to do? Plot them on a graph and calculate the best-fitting line, of course. But statisticians agree that the line shouldn't extend beyond the range of known points without signaling to the reader that they've entered hypothetical territory--by switching to a dotted line, for instance. Such signposts go missing all the time in four leading medical journals, says Yen-Hong Kuo, a biostatistician at the Jersey Shore Medical Center in Neptune, New Jersey.
Kuo scoured every issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and the British Medical Journal published in the first half of 2000 looking for scatter plots with lines drawn through them. Of 37 such plots, almost 60% had a line running beyond the actual data points, which all of them failed to indicate, Kuo reported here on 14 September at the Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. In four cases, the lines extended so far that the graphs made no sense. One JAMA paper, for instance, suggested that patients arrived at emergency rooms before the onset of stroke symptoms (see graph) while a study published in The Lancet implied that patients secrete a negative amount of proteins in their urine.
Such gaffes may be statistical misdemeanors, says Kuo, but they can be confusing, or even dangerous if they lead doctors to choose the wrong treatment. And medical journal editors at the meeting acknowledged that they should do a better job. But bad best-fit lines seem impossible to erase, says Barbara Hawkins, an epidemiologist specializing in ophthalmology at Johns Hopkins University. "It's one of my pet peeves," says Hawkins. "I always point it out when I review a paper, but it doesn't always get fixed."
Abstract of the talk (Search for 'Kuo' on this page)
About the dangers of extrapolation: an excerpt from Mark Twain's Life on the Mississippi
The Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication