- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Protesters Move In at Livermore
28 December 2001 (All day)
Although established soon after the first Russian atomic bomb exploded in 1949, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California long ago expanded beyond its initial arms focus to research ranging from geology to astronomy. But it's the weapons work that remains most prominent and has provoked the most debate. Now Livermore is being forced to confront dissent on its campus.
Three public-interest groups have unfurled two giant posters in the visitors center, inviting the public and scientists to ponder the perils of the lab's mission. All are West Coast based: San Francisco Bay Area Physicians for Social Responsibility, Western States Legal Foundation, and Tri-Valley CAREs, founded in 1983 specifically out of concern regarding nuclear weapons research at national labs. The organizations are benefiting from a 1985 court ruling ordering Livermore to set aside room for "alternative viewpoints" in its publicly funded space.
One poster, of a bomb in a skull, advises: "Your health is a terrible thing to waste. Livermore Lab has released a million curies of radiation locally." The other skull depicts the target chamber of the controversial National Ignition Facility (which is designed to aid future bomb design) and warns: "Nuclear weapons science? Your mind is a terrible thing to waste."
"We believe this display will encourage more scientists to leave the project," says Marylia Kelley of Tri-Valley CAREs, explaining one goal of the campaign.
Livermore spokesperson Susan Houghton says the Tri-Valley group members are "entitled to their opinion. We don't validate or verify any of their allegations." Nonetheless, she adds, "if you look beyond the headline the facts don't support it. We've had two [radiation] incidents, in the '60s and '70s, that were both below the allowable limits at the time." The groups added up emissions from both, she says, "to create a sexy number."