- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Seeking Consensus on Data Sharing
26 February 2002 (All day)
WASHINGTON, D.C.--Scientists and journal editors began to chisel out some commandments on the ethics of publishing yesterday at the National Academy of Sciences. The participants, led by Thomas Cech, president of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland, endorsed the principle that authors must make "freely available" all data supporting a published scientific claim. However, the group did not decide who would enforce this standard.
The keynote speaker, Eric Lander of the Whitehead Genome Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, acknowledged that this meeting grew out of a recent disagreement. As principal author of a draft version of the human genome published in Nature last year, Lander strongly disapproved of the way a commercial group--Celera Genomics Inc. in Rockville, Maryland--published a rival paper in Science (16 February 2001, p. 1304). Unlike Lander's group, Celera did not release supporting data through GenBank, a government-funded repository. Instead, Celera allowed readers to view data at a Web site the company controls. Lander said Science did "a disservice" to the community in agreeing to this form of data release. He asked the academy group to reject what he called "partial data release."
Some agreed. But Ari Patrinos, director of biological and environmental research at the Department of Energy which helped fund the genome sequencing effort, strongly dissented. It would be "a mistake," he argued, to impose a simple rule demanding that authors always make databases available in a public repository, for this could have a chilling effect on publications from the private sector. Patrinos urged the community not adopt "feel-good" policies that only suit academics.
Although the working session did not reach a full consensus, Cech summed up principles which he hoped all could agree on. A draft says that authors have a responsibility to "undertake reasonable efforts to make data and materials integral to a publication available in a manner that enables replication and further science." An academy panel aims to write a report within a few months filling in the details. Meanwhile, Cech said, the National Institutes of Health is preparing updated guidelines of its own and will offer financial support to encourage the sharing of data and materials.