- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Foul Play Suspected in Neanderthal Case
24 April 2002 (All day)
A dent in a 36,000-year-old skull resulted from a vicious attack by a Neanderthal family member, according to a new study. This conclusion, published in the 30 April issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is drawn from a 3D computer reconstruction of the St. Césaire skull found in France in 1979. The authors say their findings have important implications for understanding the social lives of Neanderthals. But critics say a simple accident could just as well explain the bump on the hominid's head.
Anthropologist Christoph Zollikofer and colleagues from the University of Zurich, Switzerland, created the virtual reconstruction from x-ray images of the fragmented skull, which likely belonged to a young Neanderthal man. The researchers identified a bony scar close to the midline of the head that they say resembles damage caused by a sharp object. The straight edge and orientation of the scar indicates to Zollikofer that the man was attacked with a tool or weapon with a handle--such as a stone axe. Zollikofer says the scar's location, on the crown of the head, suggests that other possible causes--falling on a sharp edge, a hunting accident, or a piece of rock falling on the man's head--are less likely. Because Neanderthals gathered in family groups and had sparse contact with other humans, a violent act within the family is the most likely explanation, Zollikofer concludes.
But his analysis also suggests the man probably survived the incident. The bone structure of the skull indicates the scar had time to heal--at least a couple months. Zollikofer speculates that the man was saved by the care of his relatives. If correct, this interpretation supports the view of some anthropologists that the social intelligence of Neanderthals, who disappeared about 30,000 years ago, rivaled that of Cro-Magnons--early modern humans.
Richard Klein, an anthropologist at Stanford University, says the evidence for the head wound is "interesting," but he adds that "it's possible to imagine that it reflects an accident rather than interpersonal violence." Tim White, an anthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley, agrees that the case for interpersonal violence is weak. He proposes an alternative scenario: "A spark flew out of the fire into the Neanderthal's crotch and he stood up quickly, screaming. But he forgot the low irregular ceiling. He received a bump on the head. Violent? I'll say! But not interpersonal violence."