- News Home
10 April 2014 11:44 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
Since 2002, researchers have reported that agricultural communities in the hot and humid Pacific Coast of Central...
Balkan endemic kidney disease surfaced in the 1950s and for decades defied attempts to finger the cause. It occurred...
The Pyrenean ibex, an impressive mountain goat that lived in the central Pyrenees in Spain, went extinct in 2000. But a...
Tight budgets are forcing NASA to consider turning off one or more planetary science projects that have completed their...
Ebola is not a stranger to West Africa—an outbreak in the 1990s killed chimpanzees and sickened one researcher. But the...
In an as-yet-unpublished report, an international panel of geoscientists has concluded that a pair of deadly...
Tropical disease experts tried and failed before to eradicate yaws, a rare disfiguring disease of poor countries. Now,...
- 10 April 2014 11:44 am , Vol. 344 , #6180
- About Us
A Gene for Fear
18 July 2002 (All day)
Compared to eye color and pattern baldness, linking genes and behaviors has been a tough nut to crack. A new study in the 19 July issue of Science makes a substantial dent: It shows that versions of a single gene can influence how the brain responds to emotion-laden stimuli. The finding could help explain why one version of the gene seems to make people prone to anxiety.
The gene in question encodes a transporter protein that shuttles the neurotransmitter serotonin back into neurons after it has been released. The gene comes in two common versions, or alleles. One contains a short promoter region (the stretch of DNA that controls the gene's expression); the other has a longer promoter. An early hint that the transporter gene influences behavior came from the finding that people who have a copy of the short allele are slightly more likely (3% or 4%) to show signs of anxiety or fearfulness on clinical personality tests than are those with two copies of the long allele.
A team led by psychiatrist and neurologist Daniel Weinberger of the National Institute of Mental Health in Bethesda, Maryland, reasoned that the gene's effect might show up more clearly in the brain's emotional command center: an almond-shaped region called the amygdala. The researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging to monitor activity in the amygdalas of 28 volunteers. While being scanned, subjects saw a picture of a face with either an angry or frightened expression and then had to choose which of two other faces showed the same emotion.
Both groups matched expressions correctly about 90% of the time. But people with at least one copy of the short allele showed considerably more activity in their right amygdalas while engaged in the task. "The amygdala puts a label on information that says 'This is dangerous,' " Weinberger explains, and a hyperactive amygdala might explain why people with the short allele are more prone to anxiety.
"It's a fascinating study," says Joseph LeDoux, a neuroscientist at New York University. "It will surely stimulate lots of additional work on the neural basis of normal and pathological fear and anxiety."