- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
Biology Departments Urged to Bone Up
10 September 2002 (All day)
Most biology majors are not being adequately prepared for research careers in biomedical science, which is becoming ever more technical and quantitative, concludes a new report released today by the National Academy of Science's Research Council (NRC). The panel found that undergraduates headed for biomedical research need more math, chemistry, and physics than they currently get.
Many of the recommended changes are longtime favorites of science education reformers (Science, 31 August 2000, p. 1607), such as offering thought-provoking lab exercises and independent research projects. To improve quantitative skills, faculty members should include more concepts from math and physical sciences in biology classes. Ideally, the report says, the entire curriculum would be revamped to add more heft. "Most undergraduates are being prepared for the biology of the past, not the future," says panel chair Lubert Stryer of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California.
But these changes face many obstacles, including the expense of developing new course materials and the conservative influence of the Medical College Admission Test, a national test that all would-be U.S. medical students must take. When it comes to curricula, there is also a massive amount of inertia in higher education: "People say the only institution more conservative is the [Catholic] Church," says Peter Bruns, vice president for grants and special programs at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), which helped fund the study. Even when reform is on the agenda, however, it's hard for departments to agree on how to carry it out.
The report urges faculty members to develop interdisciplinary courses, and it offers several sample curricula that could help better prepare undergraduates for biological research. But the panel also recommended that each department analyze its own needs. "It's very wise that the committee didn't try to spell out specific recipes, because one size does not fit all," comments biologist Shirley Tilghman, president of Princeton University.
One way to achieve change is by sweetening the pot. Toward that end, next week HHMI will award $1 million over 4 years to each of 20 senior faculty members who have proposed ways to improve undergraduate biology education at their institutions. The idea is to provide role models as well as the necessary resources. That approach makes good sense to Stryer, who says that energetic leadership is a key ingredient in making the panel's recommendations a reality.