- News Home
10 April 2014 11:44 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
Tight budgets are forcing NASA to consider turning off one or more planetary science projects that have completed their...
Ebola is not a stranger to West Africa—an outbreak in the 1990s killed chimpanzees and sickened one researcher. But the...
In an as-yet-unpublished report, an international panel of geoscientists has concluded that a pair of deadly...
Tropical disease experts tried and failed before to eradicate yaws, a rare disfiguring disease of poor countries. Now,...
Since 2002, researchers have reported that agricultural communities in the hot and humid Pacific Coast of Central...
Balkan endemic kidney disease surfaced in the 1950s and for decades defied attempts to finger the cause. It occurred...
The Pyrenean ibex, an impressive mountain goat that lived in the central Pyrenees in Spain, went extinct in 2000. But a...
- 10 April 2014 11:44 am , Vol. 344 , #6180
- About Us
The Flattest Star
12 June 2003 (All day)
Stars are round, right? Not always. They can be flattened if they rotate fast. Astronomers have now measured what turns out to be the flattest star known: one that's hot, blue, and shaped like an M&M's chocolate candy. The measurements will help astronomers to better understand the insides of rapidly spinning stars, says team member Pierre Kervella of the European Southern Observatory (ESO).
The team, led by Armando Domiciano de Souza of the University Astrophysical Laboratory in Nice, France, used ESO's Very Large Telescope Interferometer in Chile to observe Achernar--a star 10 times larger and six times more massive than the sun--in the fall of 2002. The interferometer combines the light of two small telescopes to achieve the same image resolution as an imaginary 140-meter telescope. This enabled the astronomers to measure the shape of the star, which, at a distance of 145 light-years, looks as small as an M&M in Chicago would appear from New York.
Achernar turned out to be much flatter than expected, Kervella says. In fact, its polar diameter is a mere 64% of its equatorial diameter (the previous record was 85%). That was a surprise, given that the spin rate of 225 kilometers per second suggested a flattening of only 80%. One possible reason is that gas inside a star may spin even faster than the gas on the surface, which would bloat its midriff, says Grant Bazán of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in California. Studying that effect would require a three-dimensional model of the star, says Kervella.
Peter Eggleton, also of LLNL, says that shape measurements like the ones of Achernar are "very important" to improve the models and thus our understanding of the interior structure of stars. But Eggleton warns that the team may actually have measured the shape of an equatorial disk of hot gas, ejected by the rapidly spinning star. However, Kervella says simultaneous measurements of the spectrum of light emitted by Achernar show that this is unlikely.