- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Don't Entangle the Messenger
16 July 2003 (All day)
Acting as a go-between, a particle such as an electron can create a strange quantum-mechanical connection between two others without getting entangled itself. The counterintuitive finding raises questions about the fundamental nature of that link.
Physicists hope to develop superfast quantum computers and uncrackable quantum communications by exploiting a bizarre phenomenon known as entanglement. When two particles become entangled, a measurement made on one instantly affects the other, even if it's light-years away. For example, two electrons can be entangled so that if one spins clockwise the other must spin counterclockwise, and vice versa. Strangely, both electrons spin both ways at the same time--until one of the particles is measured, at which point it must turn one way or the other, and its counterpart flops into the opposite state.
Researchers can entangle two distant particles by entangling a third, intermediary particle with the first and then with the second. For example, two scientists, Alice and Bob, might begin by combining several quantum states: one in which all three electrons spin clockwise, one in which all three spin counterclockwise, one in which only Alice's spins clockwise, and so on, to construct a complicated "pure" state of the three electrons. The combination is called pure because the various quantum waves in the sum oscillate in definite lockstep. By flipping their own electron and the intermediary in the right way, Alice and Bob entangle their particles. This approach necessarily also entangles the messenger particle.
But there's a way to keep the messenger particle from getting entangled, say theoretical physicists Ignacio Cirac, Frank Verstraete, and colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany. The trick is to add a dash of randomness to the process, they report in a paper to be published in Physical Review Letters. Alice and Bob could begin with a "mixed state," in which the oscillations of the various quantum waves are completely random. With the right set of starting conditions, they then flip their own electron and the intermediary in such a way that, in the end, their two electrons will entangle, but the go-between electron remains forever untangled.
"It's a very counterintuitive result," says Maciej Lewenstein, a theoretical physicist at the University of Hannover in Germany. It calls into question physicists' assumption that entanglement is something that flows from particle to particle, he says. Seth Lloyd, a quantum-mechanical engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says the finding suggests that it may be easier than previously believed to entangle distant quantum computers, should they ever prove practical. "It's wacky but lovely," he says.
Abstract of the paper