- News Home
24 April 2014 11:45 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
Major climate data sets have underestimated the rate of global warming in the last 15 years owing largely to poor data...
The tsetse fly is best known as the vector for the trypanosome parasites that cause sleeping sickness and a disease in...
The National Institutes of Health is revising its "two strikes" rule, which allowed researchers only one chance to...
By stabilizing the components of retromers, molecular complexes that act like recycling bins in cells, a recently...
Fossil fuels power modern society by generating heat, but much of that heat is wasted. Semiconductor devices called...
Researchers are gaining insights into what made Supertyphoon Haiyan so powerful and devastating through post-storm...
Millions around the world got a first-hand look at what it was like to be in Tacloban while it was pummeled by...
- 24 April 2014 11:45 am , Vol. 344 , #6182
- About Us
Europe Plans for Its Own CDC
30 July 2003 (All day)
Global health threats such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and West Nile virus have given a booster shot to a proposal to create a European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). In its final session before adjourning for the summer, the European Commission (EC) backed the plan, which must now be approved by the European Parliament.
The idea for such a center has been debated long and hard, but until recently most officials favored a virtual network of networks as opposed to a physical center. In the past 2 years, however, the anthrax scare and SARS drove home the importance of speed in dealing with public health threats. "We find ourselves using 19th century instruments to deal with 21st century threats," EC health commissioner David Byrne, who led the initiative, told reporters after the meeting last week.
Until the 1990s, the European Union left public health entirely in the hands of national agencies. In 1998, the European Parliament and Council of Ministers linked 15 national disease surveillance networks. But surveillance standards vary from one country to another. Moreover, the EC lacks the scientific and technical support it needs to decide on an E.U.-wide response, says Ronald Haigh, head of the EC's communicable diseases unit. When the E.U. admits 10 new member states next year, coordination will be even more complex.
Under the new proposal, the existing surveillance network would be transferred to ECDC, although responsibility for action would remain with the member states. The center would not employ many disease experts but could bring them in quickly when needed. It would provide technical assistance to member states--in the form of investigative teams, for instance--and act as a central hub for communications. The current plan calls for a staff of up to 100 and initial funding of about $6.4 million for 2005, increasing to $33.4 million in 2007.
Byrne would like to see the center up and running by 2005, and he urged the European Parliament and Council of Ministers to translate the proposal into swift legislative action. "Communicable diseases do not respect national borders," he said. The aim of the ECDC is to ensure that "everyone [is] pulling in the same direction."