- News Home
10 April 2014 11:44 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
The Pyrenean ibex, an impressive mountain goat that lived in the central Pyrenees in Spain, went extinct in 2000. But a...
Tight budgets are forcing NASA to consider turning off one or more planetary science projects that have completed their...
Ebola is not a stranger to West Africa—an outbreak in the 1990s killed chimpanzees and sickened one researcher. But the...
In an as-yet-unpublished report, an international panel of geoscientists has concluded that a pair of deadly...
Tropical disease experts tried and failed before to eradicate yaws, a rare disfiguring disease of poor countries. Now,...
Since 2002, researchers have reported that agricultural communities in the hot and humid Pacific Coast of Central...
Balkan endemic kidney disease surfaced in the 1950s and for decades defied attempts to finger the cause. It occurred...
- 10 April 2014 11:44 am , Vol. 344 , #6180
- About Us
Early Diversity in the Americas
4 September 2003 (All day)
A new analysis of ancient skulls from Mexico's Baja California bolsters the case that the first people to settle in the Americas came from more than one part of the world.
Some 12,000 years ago, the ancestors of today's native Americans migrated from North Asia via a land bridge across the Bering Strait that was later submerged when the glaciers melted. Indeed, most modern native Americans share many physical features with north Asians. But a growing mystery has arisen because the oldest skulls that have been found in North America, such as the 9000-year-old Kennewick Man and even older "paleoamericans," bear no resemblance to today's native Americans. At least some of the first Americans, it would seem, came from somewhere other than north Asia. The new find, reported in the 4 September issue of Nature, deepens the intrigue.
Anthropologists from Spain, Mexico, and Argentina describe newly discovered skulls from people who inhabited the Baja peninsula about 2000 years ago. The team, headed by Rolando González-José of the University of Barcelona, took detailed measurements of 33 skulls found on the tip of the peninsula and stored in two museums in Mexico and compared them to skulls from around the world. Despite their relative recency, the Baja skulls bore little resemblance to the skulls of Aztecs and other native Americans. They most resembled paleoamerican skulls, which have features in common with some South Asians and Pacific islanders.
This, say the authors, supports the notion that not all the earliest Americans came from northern Asia, but some--descendants of people who were also ancestors to Australian aboriginals--came around all the way from southern Asia. The authors speculate that being geographically isolated by a desert helped the early Baja inhabitants retain their resemblance to ancient forebears.
The paper adds fuel to a "fiery debate" about the settling of the Americas, says Tom Dillehay of the University of Kentucky, Lexington. But he and others have reservations. "By itself, cranial morphology is not something you want to go to the bank with," says Douglas Meltzer of Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. He and Dillehay both say that genetic data are needed to prove that the Baja people represent a separate population from American Indians. Even so, Dillehay says, the find adds to evidence that the current theory on how the Americas were peopled may need revision. "It's looking more and more as though there were several different founding populations, arriving from different places."