- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Hot Prize for Cold Physics
7 October 2003 (All day)
Three theorists have gotten a warm reception for their work on the very cold. Vitaly Ginzburg, Alexei Abrikosov, and Anthony Leggett have been awarded this year's Nobel Prize in Physics and will split the $1.3 million award.
The prize honors Ginzburg and Abrikosov's work on superconductors, materials that lose all electrical resistance at very low temperatures. Superconductivity, which was discovered early in the 20th century, was a baffling phenomenon that seemed to defy conventional wisdom about how materials should behave. In 1950, Ginzburg, of the P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute in Moscow, and colleague Lev Landau formulated a theory that describes how superconductors behave when subjected to a magnetic field. The Ginzburg-Landau theory implied that superconductors can behave in two different ways when exposed to ever-stronger magnetic fields. Type-I superconductors are completely impermeable to magnetism; magnetic "field lines" can't pass through the superconducting material at all. Type-II superconductors, though, have a limited capacity to allow field lines to penetrate. Abrikosov, who's now at Argonne National Laboratory in Argonne, Illinois, built upon the Ginzburg-Landau theory to characterize the behavior of type-II superconductors; he predicted, for example, that penetrating field lines would create a regular lattice pattern in the superconductor, a phenomenon observed directly in 1967.
Although a fuller description of superconductivity would have to await BCS theory, which was formulated by three physicists (Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer) in the late 1950s, "Ginzburg and Abrikosov did extremely important phenomenological work before BCS theory," says Leggett, who hails from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Leggett's own contribution, however, has to do not with superconductivity, but superfluidity, a phenomenon wherein very cold liquid helium acquires strange properties, such as flowing without friction. BCS theory explained helium-4's superfluidity nicely, but it didn't seem to work for helium-3. The atoms in helium-3 pair up, making it a more complex beast than the solitary atoms in superfluid helium-4. By taking this complexity into account, Leggett explained how helium-3 superfluidity fits into the existing theory.
"I was absolutely floored," says Robert Schrieffer, a physicist at Florida State University (and the S of BCS theory), of his reaction to Leggett's analysis. "We thought that the reach of the theory would be for ordinary metal superconductors," but not for helium-3. Schrieffer says he repeatedly nominated all three of today's winners for the prize. The Nobel committee certainly agreed--and given that four of the last eight physics Nobels have had to do with the physics of low temperatures, it's clear that cold research doesn't mean a cold shoulder from the Swedish Academy.