- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
A Shadow Over Dark Energy
19 December 2003 (All day)
The mysterious dark energy, believed to accelerate the expansion of the universe, may not exist, according to an international team of astronomers; instead, the universe may be mainly composed of ordinary matter. Recent x-ray observations carried out by the European XMM-Newton Observatory are in conflict with the increasingly popular model of a universe dominated by dark energy, the team says. But other astronomers aren't swayed.
Several studies this year have convinced many astronomers that the ordinary matter we all know--the kind that creates gravity--makes up only a few percent of the universe, while almost three-quarters consists of a strange dark energy that pushes galaxies ever farther apart (ScienceNOW, 18 December).
To check those figures, the researchers took a close look at massive clusters of galaxies. With so little matter around to pull them together, they reasoned, such clusters would have stopped growing quite early in the universe's 14-billion-year history, and new ones would have stopped forming. In a high-matter-density universe, however, massive clusters would continue to form and grow over time. So by counting galaxy clusters at various epochs (corresponding with various distances, because distant objects are seen as they were long ago) and calculating how massive they are, astronomers can tell where ordinary matter really ranks in the cosmic recipe. "Galaxy clusters are very important cosmological tools," says Neta Bahcall of Princeton University, "provided you know their masses."
But estimating cluster masses turns out to be hard. X-ray satellites observe the glow of the hot gas inside clusters, but the relation between the observed x-ray luminosity of galaxy clusters and their derived total mass may have been different in the past than it is now. Recently, a team led by David Lumb of the European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC) in Noordwijk, the Netherlands, used XMM-Newton to quantify this evolutionary effect. Using these data, Sebastien Vauclair and Alain Blanchard of the Observatory Midi-Pyrénées in France and their colleagues carried out a new analysis of galaxy cluster number counts and conclude that they are consistent with a high-density universe. That means there's little room for dark energy.
Bahcall lauds the new detailed observations of distant galaxy clusters, but, she says, "it's not straightforward to draw conclusions. It's always difficult to convert x-ray luminosity into mass." What is needed, says Bahcall, is a complete sample of distant clusters for which masses are known exactly, for instance through gravitational-lens observations. Hans Böhringer of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany, agrees that it's too early to draw conclusions. "Better work published soon will show that there is not yet a major conflict" between the XMM data and the concordance model, he says.