- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Trading Data With the 'Enemy'
15 March 2004 (All day)
After months of protests by U.S. publishers, the federal government last week indicated that it was preparing to ease restrictions on the publication of papers from countries under a U.S. trade embargo. But the good news was accompanied by a troubling development on another front--the government's decision to prevent more than 50 U.S. scientists from attending a conference in Cuba.
Both actions involve the Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which is responsible for enforcing trade sanctions against Iran, Sudan, Libya, and Cuba. Last September, the agency ruled that U.S. journals needed a government license to edit submissions from these four countries (Science, 19 September 2003, p. 1646). A senior OFAC official told Science last week that the agency expects to grant blanket permission for the editing of manuscripts from embargoed countries. That would effectively end the editing ban.
"It's nice that OFAC is rethinking its stand," says Jean Smith, a spokesperson for Congressman Howard Berman (D-CA). In a letter to OFAC on 3 March, Berman called the agency's September ruling "patently absurd" and inconsistent with a 1988 law that exempts information from economic embargoes.
Meanwhile, however, OFAC's policies are threatening another type of scientific exchange--travel to scientific meetings. Last month OFAC sent out warning letters to U.S. researchers who were scheduled to attend the Fourth International Symposium on Coma and Death in Havana, Cuba, which met last week, threatening "criminal and/or civil penalties" if they traveled to the meeting without a specific license. None of the U.S. participants attended.
Although travel to Cuba is restricted under the U.S. government's Trading With the Enemy Act, U.S. professionals can attend international meetings or do research without seeking prior approval from OFAC. Several U.S. researchers had attended the same meeting previously under this provision and were planning to do so again. "Those meetings were no different from this one, and I had no trouble traveling to them without a license," says Stuart Youngner, a bioethicist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. This time, he wasn't going to risk it--"I didn't want to go to jail."
OFAC's position could close "unique avenues for the flow of scientific information from Cuba to the U.S.," says Frank Muller-Karger, a marine scientist at the University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, who holds a specific OFAC license and travels frequently to Cuba for research. Muller-Karger is particularly concerned that isolating Cuban scientists "may result in less access to Cuban waters," which would adversely affect "U.S. meteorological and oceanographic research."