- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
United Nations Ducks Clone Vote
22 November 2004 (All day)
The United Nations on 19 November made a last-minute decision to give up efforts to fashion a global treaty charting an international policy on human cloning. Instead, the U.N.'s legal committee fell back on an Italian proposal that will be used as a basis for a nonbinding cloning "declaration."
Mirroring the cloning stalemate in the U.S. Congress, the U.N. appears to have given up, for now, its attempts to take a strong stand on human cloning. The committee was scheduled to vote on competing resolutions: a total cloning ban sponsored by Costa Rica and 60 other nations and a reproductive cloning ban, pushed by Belgium, that would have left the door open for research cloning, otherwise known as nuclear transfer. But the deadline for the vote came and went.
The U.N. action--or lack thereof--is a blow for the Bush Administration, which strongly backed the Costa Rican proposal. But a State Department spokesperson put the best face on it, calling it "a moderate success" because it failed to endorse any kind of cloning. The Royal Society of London, on the other hand, said it was "disappointed" by the U.N.'s failure to agree on a worldwide ban on reproductive cloning.
Bernard Siegel, a Florida lawyer who created a lobby called the Genetics Policy Institute in Coral Gables in response to the issue, calls the committee decision a "triumph" for researchers. Siegel says a "declaration" against research cloning would have much less authority than a treaty, which he says would lead to new laws in member countries and would have a "chilling" effect on research. And, he notes, any declaration that U.N. members eventually succeed in agreeing on is likely to be vaguely worded.
The Italian proposal, which will be taken up as a basis for discussion by the committee in February, would call on countries "to prohibit any attempts to create human life through cloning processes and any research intended to achieve that aim." On whether the term should be "human life" or "human being" will hang many more contentious debates.