- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Are Humans Still Evolving?
18 January 2005 (All day)
Are we beyond the forces of evolution, or is natural selection still shaping us? A genomic study of modern Icelanders suggests modern humans are still a work in progress.
The finding comes from deCODE Genetics, a company based in Reykjavik, Iceland that is hunting for disease-associated genes. While analyzing DNA sequence from more than 29,000 Icelandic people, deCODE researchers discovered something intriguing. A section of chromosome 17, 900,000 base pairs long, is flipped into reverse order in about 20% of Europeans, but this flip is very rare among Africans and Asians. Inversions on a smaller scale happen frequently when chromosomes reshuffle themselves in the course of sexual reproduction. Usually, they flip back with the same frequency. Also striking was the fact that the two versions of the chromosomal section appear to have been around for some 3 million years, long before the appearance of modern Homo sapiens.
The fact that such an extended stretch of inverted DNA appears to have been maintained for so long and today is carried by 1 in 5 Europeans suggested that it must provide some kind of evolutionary advantage in the European environment. If natural selection played no role, one of the two versions would have likely dropped to a low frequency long ago.
So a team of deCODE geneticists led by Kari Stefansson, Augustine Kong, and Hreinn Stefansson took advantage of Iceland's extensive genealogical and medical records to look for clues. The results of the study, published in the February issue of Nature Genetics, are wowing population geneticists. Women who carry the inversion have slightly more children on average than those who don't, which would have a powerful effect over the long timeframe on which evolution acts. However, the team admits that exactly how the inversion results in larger families--and therefore more copies of itself--remains a mystery. The genes that lie in the section do not seem to be directly related to fertility. The genomes of women carrying the inversion also had slightly more shuffling of genes between copies of their chromosomes, a process known to be important for avoiding diseases.
"This could be the tip of several icebergs," says Peter Donnelly, a statistician at the University of Oxford, U.K. "If such inversions are common, then there isn't just one version of the human genome." He adds that "this shows natural selection is still acting on us."