- News Home
12 December 2013 1:00 pm ,
Vol. 342 ,
Stefan Behnisch has won awards for designing science labs and other buildings that are smart, sustainable, and...
The iconic 125-year-old Lick Observatory on Mount Hamilton near San Jose, California, is facing the threat of closure...
Recent results from the Curiosity Mars rover have helped scientists formulate a plan for the next phase of its mission...
A new, remarkably powerful drug that cripples the hepatitis C virus (HCV) came to market last week, but it sells for $...
In pretoothbrush populations, gumlines would often be marred by a thick, visible crust of calcium phosphate, food...
Evolutionary biologists have long studied how the Mexican tetra, a drab fish that lives in rivers and creeks but has...
Victorian astronomers spent countless hours laboriously charting the positions of stars in the sky. Such sky mapping,...
In an ambitious project to study 1000 years of sickness and health, researchers are excavating the graveyard of the now...
- 12 December 2013 1:00 pm , Vol. 342 , #6164
- About Us
Making Antihydrogen Cooler
4 January 2005 (All day)
A clever new way to make antihydrogen may bring scientists one step closer to understanding how matter differs from antimatter.
For years, a handful of antimatter-makers known as the ATRAP collaboration and a rival group, ATHENA, have been cooling antiprotons (which come from a beam at CERN, the European particle physics lab near Geneva, Switzerland) and antielectrons (which come from a radioactive source) and mixing them in a magnetic bottle in hopes of producing antihydrogen. Both teams have created thousands of antihydrogen atoms this way (Science, 15 November 2002, p. 1327). However, those antihydrogens were relatively warm--several degrees above absolute zero--and, therefore, too fast to capture and study in detail.
ATRAP's new method collects antiprotons and antielectrons in separate magnetic traps. Then researchers shoot a beam of cesium atoms toward the antielectrons. As the cesiums fly, lasers excite the atoms, forcing their electrons into larger-than-typical orbits around the cesium nucleus. These larger orbits increase the odds that a cesium atom will strike an antielectron in the trap, says Harvard physicist and ATRAP member Gerald Gabrielse.
After impact, the cesium's electron binds to an antielectron, forming an unstable and excited conglomerate known as positronium. The positroniums zoom away in all directions, and some wind up in the nearby trap containing antiprotons. Following another collision, the antielectron once again jumps ship and hops to the antiproton, forming an excited antihydrogen.
This Rube Goldberg-ish method has so far produced fewer than two dozen antihydrogens, the team reports in the 31 December issue of Physical Review Letters. But in principle, it should allow physicists to create very cold and slow-moving antihydrogens, which would be easier to study.
"Anything that goes in this direction is welcome," says Rolf Landua, a CERN physicist and member of the ATHENA collaboration. But the low yield is a problem, he cautions, and studying the produced antihydrogen properly will likely require deexciting the atoms, perhaps with another laser. "Maybe, in the end, that will be the way forward, but it looks complicated," Landua says.
Unfortunately, scientists will have to wait to find out. The antiproton source at CERN has been shut down until 2006 to speed construction of the Large Hadron Collider.