- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Miracle Grow Mountains
29 June 2005 (All day)
Some Norwegian rocks are telling a racy tale. They're the survivors of a mountain growth spurt a mere 13 million years long--outrageously speedy compared to the tens or hundreds of millions of years geologists thought mountains needed to grow. The new evidence suggests that fast growth of young ranges may not be unusual, and it could force geologists to reevaluate how long it took older mountain ranges such as the Appalachians to sprout.
When two plates of Earth's crust collide, the land buckles and folds. Rocks near the surface are forced down into the depths, where the high pressure squeezes, heats, and sometimes even melts the stones. The heat and pressure can cook the rocks so much that all of their gases bubble out. Since one technique for dating these rocks involves measuring the amount of argon gas they contain, cooked rocks are effectively "reborn" when a mountain forms. As such, the age of the rocks accurately reflects the age of the mountain.
So geochronologist James Lee of Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, and colleagues were perplexed when a pair of billion-year-old rocks were reported in the 425-million-year old Caledonian mountain range in Norway. The only thing that could explain this discrepancy, the researchers argue, is if some of the original argon gas had remained in the rocks when the mountains formed. This would mean that the mountains must have formed very quickly--not giving the earth enough time to heat the stones. By the team's calculations, described in tomorrow's Nature, the mountains must have formed in 13 million years, at least three times faster than most ranges were assumed to grow.
"They've shown that the mountain building rates of old mountain ranges are the same as those of younger mountain ranges that are growing right now," says Kip Hodges, a geologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. Previously, some geologists thought young mountains such as the Himalayas, which seem to have grown in just 25 million years, were freakish instead of average.