- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Nepalese Porters Are World's Most Effective Carriers
16 June 2005 (All day)
When the going gets tough, the tough use their heads. Porters around the world carry loads that would floor backpackers by balancing baskets atop their noggins or slinging sacks from their craniums. Now a new study reveals that Nepalese porters do the job better than anyone else, hefting huge bundles while using relatively little energy.
Until now, the most economical head-carriers were thought to be African women. A 1995 study by physiologist Norman Heglund of the Catholic University of Louvain in Belgium and colleagues suggested that the women use a special spring in their step that enables them to conserve energy while transporting loads across level ground. However, no one had rigorously tested the energetics of Nepalese porters such as Sherpas, a group known for their role in Mount Everest expeditions. The men on average carry nearly their own body weight in goods, hauling everything from rice to televisions for up to 100 kilometers along steep dirt paths.
Heglund and colleagues tested the Nepalese porters by weighing their packs and measuring how much oxygen they used up and how much carbon dioxide they blew out, numbers directly related to how many calories they burn. Compared with backpack-carrying control subjects, the Nepalis used significantly less energy. For smaller weights, up to 20 percent of their body mass, the Nepalis were as efficient as the African women: Both walked as if unburdened. But as the weight piled on, the Nepalis showed even greater economy, Heglund and colleagues report 17 June in Science. Unlike the African women, though, the Nepalis do not appear to use a special step, so their economical walk is still a mystery. It's probably the sum of a lot of little effects learned over years of practice, Heglund says.
"It is a nice piece of research, confirming that loaded walking can be improved, as opposed to normal walking which is already metabolically optimal," says biomechanist Alberto Minetti at Manchester Metropolitan University in Cheshire, U.K. He believes the Nepalis may economize the internal work their muscles do in stabilizing the trunk of their bodies when loaded.