- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
No Candy for Kitty
25 July 2005 (All day)
Stealing candy from a cat may be even easier than stealing it from a baby, seeing as how felines have no love for sugary treats. Now scientists have figured out why: Cats lack a taste receptor protein that's essential for sensing sweet stuff.
Cats couldn't care less about confections. When given the choice between plain water and a sugar solution, they slurp similar amounts of both. But even though drinking the sugar water isn't a good idea--it can cause diarrhea and dehydration because felines have very low levels of the enzymes that break down sugars--cats will continue to do so even when they start to feel sick. This prompted researchers to believe that cats simply cannot detect the sugar.
To explain this deficit, researchers turned to genetics. Four years ago, scientists identified two genes, Tas1r2 and Tas1r3, responsible for the sweet receptor in a variety of animals. In the new study, biophysicist Joseph Brand of the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and colleagues compared the sequences of the two genes in dogs, humans, mice, and rats--all of which can detect sweets. They found that a 240 base pair stretch of Tas1r2 present in all of these creatures was missing in the feline gene. As a result, cats cannot make one of the proteins needed to create a sweet taste receptor. "The huge deletion was a surprise to me," says Brand, who adds that the degree of the mutation makes it virtually impossible for cats to ever regain their sense for sweets.
This deletion was observed not only in domestic cats but also in the tiger and cheetah, the researchers report 25 July in PLoS Genetics. Brand and his team now plan to study related animals, such the hyena and mongoose, to help trace when and why sweet taste receptors became lost in the evolutionary process.
"We have known about cats' indifference to sweets for a while, but to get it down to the level of receptors is a very interesting development," says John Bradshaw, a behavioral biologist at the University of Bristol, United Kingdom. A question that has yet to be answered, he adds, is whether the lack of sweet taste receptors drove cats to become strict carnivores or if it's the other way around.