- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
Since arriving on the island of Guam in the 1940s, the brown tree snake ( Boiga irregularis ) has extirpated native...
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
Going Hungry to Live Longer
17 October 2005 (All day)
VANCOUVER, CANADA--A looming question in the calorie restriction field is what the drastic diet does to humans--and whether, as in many species, it extends life. Preliminary results from human tests can't answer that second question yet. However, they show that short-term calorie restriction prevents some oxygen damage to cells--but then, so do a milder combination of diet and exercise.
No one is quite sure how calorie restriction works or what it will do to people. But in nearly every species tested, from yeast to mice, the regimen extends life, sometimes by up to 50%. A popular theory is that the diet reduces oxidative stress, a common part of aging in which cells all over the body are damaged by free oxygen radicals. Long-term studies in primates are finding that cutting calories may prevent age-related diseases such as atherosclerosis, but it's not yet clear whether such a diet helps them live longer.
In 2002, the National Institute on Aging began funding studies called CALERIE, which included up to one year of calorie restriction in humans at three centers around the country. The first to finish, the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, reported results from its 6-month trial yesterday at the annual meeting of NAASO, the Obesity Society.
Run by physiologist Eric Ravussin, graduate student Madlyn Frisard, and others, the Pennington study recruited 48 sedentary, healthy, somewhat overweight individuals aged 25 to 50. The researchers assigned the subjects to one of four groups: calorie restriction by 25%; calorie restriction by 12.5% combined with aerobic exercise; cutting calories until volunteers had lost 15% of their body weight, and then maintaining that weight; and a healthy diet recommended by the American Heart Association that wasn't intended to induce weight loss. Volunteers were occasionally put in special chambers that measured their body's energy expenditure.
After 6 months, Frisard reported, the first three groups had similar results. Energy expenditure decreased by around 5%, meaning metabolism was lower, and blood tests showed that oxidative damage dropped to levels 10-15% lower than the control group on the heart-healthy diet. In other words, in this brief study, strict calorie restriction didn't seem to afford special benefits compared to other approaches. However, Frisard said she didn't know whether differences among these groups would show up in the longer term. And it's far too soon to say whether severe diets can extend human life, she added.
"It's very early," agreed James Hill, director of the Center for Human Nutrition at the University of Colorado in Denver. Still, he says, he found the results "optimistic"--because they hint that long-term strict dieting may not be the only way to protect cells from oxygen damage.