- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
26 October 2005 (All day)
When it comes to gift-giving, chimps are chumps. An experiment with captive chimpanzees finds they are not motivated to help others even if it costs them nothing.
There are plenty of examples of apparently altruistic behavior among animals, such as sharing food and grooming. But implicit in these acts is a reward, either because the receiver is a close relative or because the giver expects reciprocation in the future. In contrast, humans often commit acts of kindness for complete strangers, such as giving blood, where the reward is mostly the feeling of doing a good deed. Are nonhuman animals also capable of such relatively selfless acts? One theory predicts that humans may be unique in this regard because such behavior only arises in social groups as large and extended as ours, where altruism between strangers is required to keep society stable.
To see if chimpanzees share the same selflessness, a team led by Joan Silk, a behavioral biologist at the University of California at Los Angeles, designed a charity-giving machine. When inside the main chamber, a chimp had the option of two levers. The first simply produced a snack. The second yielded the same food but also delivered a similar serving to a chimp that could be seen waiting in a second chamber. As a control, the researchers also presented chimps with the same options while the second chamber was empty.
This setup "maximizes" the chances of catching chimps acting selflessly, says Silk, because there is no cost to giving the gift. To rule out the possible motivation of family ties, the researchers tested both related and unrelated chimps.
The chimps only cared that they got their own snack. They were not significantly more likely than chance to give a gift under any circumstances, no matter who the receiver was, the team reports 27 October in Nature. And it doesn't seem to be for a lack of understanding how the system worked. When on the receiving end, chimps often begged the chimp controlling the levers.
"This is a pathbreaking paper," says Ernst Fehr, an experimental economist at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, because it is throws into doubt the view of primate researchers who have emphasized the similarity of altruism in chimps and humans. In related experiments with human teenagers, almost all give the gift, he says.