- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
A Final Note of Discord
30 May 2006 (All day)
Britain's largest university union opted to go out with a bang yesterday when it urged its 67,000 members to consider boycotting individuals and institutions "that do not publicly dissociate themselves" from Israel's policies toward Palestinians. Scientific leaders around the world strongly condemned the union's action, which the union's own executive officer had advised against.
The 67,000-strong National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education (NATFHE) adopted the resolution, which denounces Israel's "apartheid policies, including construction of the exclusion wall," on 29 May at its annual meeting in Blackpool. The resolution may not carry much formal weight, however: On 1 June the NATFHE will cease to exist as it merges into a new organization, the University and College Lecturers' Union. The boycott resolution will only be "advisory" to the new organization, according to a spokesperson.
But critics worry that it may encourage a de facto "grey boycott." Academics could be judged not on merit but "according to their nationality and political opinions," warns political scientist Jonathan Rynhold of Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan, Israel, which was targeted by an earlier boycott attempt.
Even before it passed, the proposal drew heavy criticism from within the union and outside. NATFHE General Secretary Paul Mackney, although a supporter of the Palestinian cause, urged members not to endorse the boycott because it had not been vetted within the union, a spokesperson for NATFHE says. Several thousand U.S. and Israeli academics made public their objections in May, as did several Nobel Prize winners, including University of Texas physicist Steven Weinberg. The board of the AAAS (publisher of Science) last week called the NATFHE proposal "antithetical to the role of free scientific inquiry" and asked that it be withdrawn.
After the vote, astronomer Martin Rees, president of Britain's Royal Society, issued a statement deploring the action, saying that "NATFHE members ... should remember that boycotts of scientists at Israeli universities grossly violate the principles set out by the International Human Rights Network of Academies and Scholarly Societies." The guidelines rule out attempts to block the free expression of ideas and opinions and were drafted by scientific leaders 4 years ago in response to an earlier boycott petition, which failed.