- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Poehlman Sentenced to 1 Year of Prison
28 June 2006 (All day)
Researcher Eric Poehlman was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison today for making a false statement on a federal grant application in 1999. The action by U.S. District Judge William Sessions in Burlington, Vermont, ends the most extensive case of scientific misconduct in the history of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Experts say the case marks the first time a U.S. scientist will serve jail time for research misconduct not linked to fatalities.
Poehlman admitted in a plea agreement last year to falsifying 15 federal grant applications in addition to as many as 10 articles beginning in 1992 and spanning a decade (Science, 25 March 2005, p. 1851) while he was a scientist at the University of Vermont College of Medicine in Burlington and, before then, the University of Maryland, Baltimore. The work involved obesity, metabolism, and menopause. Eight journals have run retractions of his papers, including the Annals of Internal Medicine. More than 200 other articles he authored remain in the literature. Prosecutors said that Poehlman made what a clerk called "factual misstatements" in an earlier federal hearing; that offense worsened the sentence.
In a letter to the judge earlier this month, Poehlman explained that he was "motivated by my own desire to advance as a respected scientist" and added that he was "ashamed of myself for falsifying and fabricating data. ... I believed that because the research questions I had framed were legitimate and worthy of study, it was okay to misrepresent 'minor' pieces of data to increase the odds that the grant would be awarded."
Poehlman faced up to 5 years in jail and has already paid a $180,000 fine. He has also been barred for life from receiving federal research funding.
The first questions about Poehlman's conduct were raised by a 24-year-old research assistant in Poehlman's lab at the University of Vermont. The university found falsifications in three papers, and a 2-year probe by NIH uncovered the rest of the crimes. A university review of Poehlman's scientific work at the University of Montreal, which he joined in 2001, found no wrongdoing in work he'd done there.
A number of scientists joined his friends in appealing to the judge for leniency. "I do believe he still has a great deal to offer the scientific community," wrote Ross Andersen, an obesity expert at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.