- News Home
10 April 2014 11:44 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
The Pyrenean ibex, an impressive mountain goat that lived in the central Pyrenees in Spain, went extinct in 2000. But a...
Tight budgets are forcing NASA to consider turning off one or more planetary science projects that have completed their...
Ebola is not a stranger to West Africa—an outbreak in the 1990s killed chimpanzees and sickened one researcher. But the...
In an as-yet-unpublished report, an international panel of geoscientists has concluded that a pair of deadly...
Tropical disease experts tried and failed before to eradicate yaws, a rare disfiguring disease of poor countries. Now,...
Since 2002, researchers have reported that agricultural communities in the hot and humid Pacific Coast of Central...
Balkan endemic kidney disease surfaced in the 1950s and for decades defied attempts to finger the cause. It occurred...
- 10 April 2014 11:44 am , Vol. 344 , #6180
- About Us
Backtracking on "Blacklisting"
5 May 2009 8:46 am
After howls of protests and charges of "blacklisting," a U.K. research council has partially backed away from a new policy that would have prevented repeatedly unsuccessful grant applicants from submitting new proposals. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) will now allow those scientists to still submit one proposal within a 12-month period, according to an amended policy released today. “They’re restricted rather than excluded,” says an EPSRC spokesperson. “If someone has a great idea, it won’t be missed.” And rather than the policy going into effect retrospectively, it won’t be enforced until April 2010.
EPSRC is hoping to reduce the volume of grants that volunteer scientists must evaluate, but some researchers were so angered by the new policy that they vowed not to look at grant submissions to the council. The modifications to the policy may bring grudging acceptance, though not happiness. Joseph Sweeney of the University of Reading, an organic chemist who had started a petition against the original EPSRC restrictions, calls the altered policy “not unreasonable.” He adds that “making it nonretrospective is a big deal.” Philip Page, an organic chemist at the University of East Anglia who also challenged EPSRC’s original policy, still chafes at the modified policy, but he will now continue to peer-review grant proposals for the council. “I should have liked to see the blacklisting abandoned altogether, and I do not think that this change in policy goes far enough, but it is good to see that EPSRC has taken some notice of the community that it serves,” says Page.