- News Home
27 November 2013 12:59 pm ,
Vol. 342 ,
The new head of the National Center for Science Education promises to "fight the good fight" against attacks on...
Analyses of the H7N9 strains isolated from four new cases show that the virus is evolving rapidly, heightening anxiety...
In 2009, Jack Szostak shared a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the role of telomeres, the end bits of...
Science has exposed a thriving academic black market in China involving shady agencies, corrupt scientists, and...
Paper-selling agencies flourish in the aura of reputable businesses. For some scientists, it may be difficult to tell...
Featuring the first lunar rover in 40 years, Chang'e-3 is seen as an important milestone on China's quest to send a...
Data collected by satellites and floating probes have chronicled a 2-decade rise in the temperature and thickness of a...
Cholesterol, the artery-clogging molecule that contributes to cardiovascular disease, has another nasty trick up its...
- 27 November 2013 12:59 pm , Vol. 342 , #6162
- About Us
Researchers Call for Second Look at Right Whale Protection
18 August 2009 3:28 pm
A group of top whale researchers is arguing that the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA should reexamine a major regulation designed to reduce collisions between ships and highly endangered North Atlantic right whales. New research, they say, emphasizes that the current zones of speed limits are not as extensive as they should be. NOAA says it is already beginning to evaluate the effectiveness of the regulation.
Only about 300 to 400 right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) still ply the waters of the North Atlantic. As they migrate up and down the eastern coast of North America, passing many major ports, some whales get tangled in fishing gear and others occasionally get hit by ships. Experts say these risks threaten the survival of the species.
In 2006, NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service proposed to set a 10-knot speed limit for ships travelling within 56 kilometers (30 nautical miles) of major ports, so that any collisions would be less likely to kill whales. The agency based its recommendation on a database of right whale sightings. But after objections from the shipping industry, the agency settled on a buffer zone of 37 kilometers (20 nautical miles).
In the new paper, a group led by Rob Shick, a postdoc at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, examined different data—locations of two female right whales tracked by satellite in 2000 as they migrated along the eastern seaboard. The whales sometimes swam further than 37 kilometers offshore. They team used a statistical model to figure out what depth of water and distance from shore the whales seemed to prefer. Bottom line: "There's a larger swath of suitable habitat than previous thought," Shick says. The paper was published online in the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences on 14 August.
"It's giving a little more evidence that the breadth of the migratory corridor might be quite a bit wider than thought," says Amy Knowlton of the New England Aquarium in Boston, who was not involved in the analysis. "I have always advocated for the 30 mile buffer and feel the evidence offered by Shick et al.'s work further justifies this broader boundary."
Greg Silber, NOAA's coordinator of recovery efforts for whales, says the agency is already preparing for possible changes, because the regulation was put in place with an unusual caveat: the rule phases out after 5 years unless it's been shown to be effective at protecting whales. Depending on what that analysis finds, the boundaries of the speed limits could be adjusted.
Photo Credit: NOAA