- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Exclusive: Congress to Explore Geoengineering Next Month
19 October 2009 3:37 pm
The U.S. Congress will explore deliberate tinkering with the climate in its first ever hearing on geoengineering early next month, ScienceInsider has learned.
Congressional committees have shied away from focusing hearings on the controversial topic until now. One reason might be that talk of a technical fix could distract from needed emissions cuts, especially with the U.S. Senate and international negotiators debating new controls on carbon pollution.
The House of Representatives' science and technology committee has slated the hearing on the controversial subject for 5 November. The exact focus of the hearing is not known, but the meeting could be a first step towards establishing dedicated federal support for geoengineering research, which currently does not exist.
Bill Fulkerson, an energy policy expert with the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, said that geoengineering research is “the most neglected part of the climate strategy we have” and that a research program is “exactly what’s needed.”
While the committee has not announced the hearing or finalized its list of witnesses, sources say it may feature John Shepherd, a scientist of the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom who led a recent study by the U.K. Royal Society on geoengineering; Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science; or Lee Lane, an official with the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy's geoengineering project. All three have called for government funding of geoengineering research.
Alex Dery Snider, spokeswoman for the House science and technology committee sent ScienceInsider this statement:
The Committee is looking to gain a greater understanding of a complicated but timely subject. We feel it would be irresponsible to ignore the issue because it is complex or potentially controversial. Our hearing should by no means be read as an endorsement of taking action. This is the appropriate venue to begin a thoughtful, in-depth conversation that includes the full range of perspectives on the topic. This is just the first step in what will be a very long discussion.
Do you think congress should be exploring this topic? Comment below.