- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Moon Impact: NASA Plays Down Lack of Fireworks
9 October 2009 (All day)
NASA officials and scientists spent the better part of an hour in this morning's press conference patting themselves on the back. The LCROSS mission in search of lunar water was a great success, they said, all the while ignoring a very large elephant in the room: No one among the millions watching as a 2-ton hunk of metal slammed into the moon could see the much-ballyhooed spray of dust and debris that they had been told to look for.
Even LCROSS scientists have seen nothing of a debris plume. "I'm not necessarily surprised," said LCROSS principal investigator Anthony Colaprete of NASA's Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California. In exploration, "you just never know how these things are going to go. We just have to go back with a finer-tooth comb." Colaprete's dogged optimism is grounded in enticing spectroscopic changes detected around the impact site. Determining whether it was water will take weeks or months of data combing.
Actually, Colaprete had warned his colleagues, at least, about the possibility of a no-show debris plume. "It's a very unproven and highly unpredictable science, impact cratering," he told an audience at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference last March. Impact modelers working for the team had struggled to simulate the impact of a cylindrical--not a simpler spherical--object, and one that was hollow, not solid, like the LCROSS impactor. Plus, it smashed into a surface of unknown shape and composition. LCROSS was "the most challenging impact modeling I've ever done," said Erik Asphaug of the University of California, Santa Cruz. There were just too many unknowns for him to be entirely comfortable with his results; impact on the odd unseen boulder, for example, could have sent most of the debris into the crater wall instead of into the sky.
LCROSS scientists may yet extract a debris plume from the data, but "the spectra is where the information is" about any water, Colaprete said, referring to spectral colors in the visible, infrared, and even ultraviolet returned by the trailing LCROSS spacecraft and by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Some of these showed intriguing blips from the impact flash and the still-warm crater. There were also spectral changes above the impact site between pre- and postimpact. "What do these little blips mean? I don't know," Colaprete said. "I'm just glad they're there. We're going to work on this feverishly." Even so, no public word about water will be forthcoming before the December meeting of the American Geophysical Union, he said.
Start rooting now for the blips.
This story first appeared on Science's news blog, Findings. You can find our full coverage of the LCROSS mission, including multimedia, here. A Facebook Q&A with author Richard Kerr can be found here.