- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Are 'Test Tube Babies' Healthy?
21 February 2010 2:47 pm
SAN DIEGO—When Louise Brown was born on 25 July 1978, she kicked off an era. The first "test tube baby" is a mother herself now, and she's been joined by millions of others born with the help of in vitro fertilization (IVF). At a press conference this morning at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (which publishes ScienceNOW), infertility specialists talked about whether people who were conceived by IVF are likely to be healthy.
"By and large, the kids are just fine. It's not like the kids have extra arms or extra heads or anything," says Carmen Sapienza, a geneticist at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. But none is older than their early 30s, and the vast majority are under the age of 20, so they haven't had time for long-term health problems to show up.
One source of worry is that so many IVF babies have low birth weight. Children conceived through IVF are more likely to weigh less than 2.5 kilograms than are babies conceived naturally. That's not just because so many IVF babies are twins or other multiple births; the same is true for single babies. That could spell trouble ahead, because low-birth-weight babies often have long-term health problems. They're more likely to be obese, to have diabetes, and to have hypertension when they're 50, for example.
With that in mind, Sapienza and colleagues have looked at genes that are likely to play a role in such health problems. They’ve examined genes involved in insulin and glucose metabolism, for example, to see whether there's a difference in how those genes are expressed in children born from IVF and children who were conceived naturally.
The upshot? For 5% to 10% of those genes, the DNA methylation patterns, which affect how genes are expressed, are different between IVF and non-IVF children. There's no way to tell if that's because of the technology used to produce the IVF babies or whether the difference has something to do with the underlying infertility problem the parents had. It’s also unclear whether these gene-expression differences will translate into health differences. But it does suggest that children conceived by IVF are unique on some level.
"From my perspective, more data is better," says Sapienza. "People get upset" about data that sounds like an attack on IVF. But if it turns out that children who were conceived by IVF had a higher risk of, say, colon cancer, he says, it would be useful to be able to tell them to get screened earlier.