- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
Goooal! Scientists Score in Ranking Soccer Stars
16 June 2010 5:00 pm
If you're new to World Cup soccer madness and wondering which team is tops, science has an answer. Researchers have developed software that can measure soccer success, creating a more sophisticated ranking system for the sport and a tool for analyzing performance in other team activities.
Unlike baseball and American football, the world's most popular sport doesn't produce many stats. Only a handful of soccer ranking systems exist, most of which rely on limited information: the number of goals scored in a match, the number of goals assisted, and some indices of a match's difficulty and importance. Although such systems are meant to assess which teams and players are the best, their focus on scores alone limits their accuracy, says Luís Amaral, a complex-systems engineer at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. "You end up with no information on anyone but the player who made the goal and the player who assisted."
An avid soccer fan, Amaral wanted to measure team and player performance in a way that takes into account the complex interactions within the team and each player's contribution. So he turned to an unlikely source: social networks. Applying the kinds of mathematical techniques used to map Facebook friends and other networks, Amaral and colleagues created software that can trace the ball's flow from player to player. As the program follows the ball, it assigns points for precise passing and for passes that ultimately lead to a shot at the goal. Whether the shot succeeds doesn't matter. "There's lots of luck involved in actually getting it in," Amaral explains. Only the ball's flow toward the goal and each player's role in getting it there factors into the program's point system, which then calculates a skill index for each team and player.
When the researchers used the program to analyze data from the 2008 UEFA European Football Championship, the indices closely matched the tournament's outcome and the overall consensus of sports reporters, coaches, and other experts who weighed in on the performances. The results appear online today in PLoS ONE.
"One of the issues with any kind of teamwork is assigning the right credit," says Amaral. "The wild, loud people get more credit, but with this analysis you can get a picture of how much an individual really contributes to an outcome."
"This is a nice paper, and it's timely—the world is holding its breath for the [World] Cup," says Alessandro Vespignani, an equally soccer-smitten computational scientist at Indiana University in Bloomington. "But it is much deeper than that. It is a powerful way to analyze any team performance: scientific teams, companies, creative groups."
Amaral plans to apply the program to other sports and fields and is already supplying it with 2010 World Cup data—with one ulterior motive. "I am from Portugal, and I was disappointed in how we played Tuesday," he says. (His team tied 0-0 with Ivory Coast.) "I'm very curious to see what score the program gives us—maybe we played better than I thought."