- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Genome of Controversial Arsenic Bacterium Sequenced
5 December 2011 5:42 pm
Our data show evidence for arsenate in macromolecules that normally contain phosphate, most notably nucleic acids and proteins.
One year ago those 18 words ignited quite a media controversy when Felisa Wolfe-Simon and her colleagues held a press conference to announce the discovery of a bacterium that not only survived high levels of arsenic in its environment but also seemed to use that element in its DNA. Five months later, the debate resurfaced with the publication of critical comments on the original research.
Last week, the genome of the bacterium, known as GFAJ-1, was posted in Genbank, the public repository of DNA sequences for all who care to take a look. But it doesn't settle the debate over whether arsenic is used in DNA.
Simon Silver, an arsenic microbiologist at the University of Illinois, Chicago, and one of the most vocal critics of the arsenic bacterium research, and his colleagues sequenced the bacterium and found 3400 genes in its 3.5 million bases. Of note is that even the common gut bacterium, Escherichia coli, has more of the genes known to help it survive arsenic exposure than GFAJ-1, Silver said in a phone interview. Silver didn't expect the genome to address the core of the controversy, but then again, he doesn't think any test will convince Wolfe-Simon and her co-authors that they are wrong. "This sort of stuff never gets resolved," he says. "It eventually goes away." Silver and his colleagues intend to compare this genome with three others from other microbes living in arsenic-rich environments to better understand arsenic-related chemistry.
Wolfe-Simon calls the genome "an important step forward. But it may take some time, data mining, and modeling to understand its implications" because the functions of so many genes are unknown. The result "begs the question even more strongly of how GFAJ‑1 survives in the high arsenic conditions we grow it in," she notes.
Her collaborator, Ronald S. Oremland from the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, California, is glad to see the genome available and, with Wolfe-Simon, still stands behind the 18 words spoken 1 year ago. Wolfe-Simon is now at working at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) with John Tainer. They have spent the past several months learning how to better grow the bacterium in hopes of more carefully characterizing the DNA and other biomolecules, such as the ribosome.
A blog at MSNBC provides a rundown of the past year and where researchers now stand in this controversy.
A time-lapse video taken by James Lim at LBNL of GFAJ-1 is here.