- News Home
24 April 2014 11:45 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
Major climate data sets have underestimated the rate of global warming in the last 15 years owing largely to poor data...
The tsetse fly is best known as the vector for the trypanosome parasites that cause sleeping sickness and a disease in...
The National Institutes of Health is revising its "two strikes" rule, which allowed researchers only one chance to...
By stabilizing the components of retromers, molecular complexes that act like recycling bins in cells, a recently...
Fossil fuels power modern society by generating heat, but much of that heat is wasted. Semiconductor devices called...
Researchers are gaining insights into what made Supertyphoon Haiyan so powerful and devastating through post-storm...
Millions around the world got a first-hand look at what it was like to be in Tacloban while it was pummeled by...
- 24 April 2014 11:45 am , Vol. 344 , #6182
- About Us
Lawmakers Reintroduce Public Access Bill
10 February 2012 12:55 pm
Lawmakers yesterday introduced a proposal to make scientific papers funded with taxpayer money available for free on the Internet. The bill adds to a recent flurry of debate about so-called public access policies.
The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), which has identical versions in the House of Representatives and the Senate, would expand to other research agencies the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) 4-year-old policy requiring investigators it funds to submit copies of their peer-reviewed manuscripts for posting in a public database. The bill would also set at 6 months the length of time an agency can wait to make the paper public after it appears in a journal (NIH's current policy is 12 months).
The bill's sponsors in the Senate are senators John Cornyn (R-TX), Ron Wyden (D-OR), and Kay Hutchison (R-TX); the House sponsors include representatives Mike Doyle (D-PA), Kevin Yoder (R-KS) and Lacy Clay (D-MO). Matt Dinkel, communications director for Doyle, said no committees have yet planned hearings on the bill, which first needs to attract more cosponsors.
Supporters of FRPAA include a business group called the Committee for Economic Development, which this week released a report finding that the NIH policy "has substantially increased public access to research results with benefits ... that far outweigh the costs."
A dueling bill in the House championed by commercial publishers would scrap the NIH policy because, supporters say, it infringes on publishers' copyright and will put journals out of business. That bill—which, like FRPAA, has been introduced before—has sparked a boycott of scientific publishing giant Elsevier.
The White House science office, which last fall asked for input on public access, recently released nearly 400 public comments that reportedly reflect the familiar wide split between supporters and opponents of such policies.