- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Despite Legal Warnings, UNESCO Finally Approves African Science Prize
9 March 2012 2:36 pm
Overruling its own legal experts, U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization's (UNESCO's) executive board yesterday finally approved a new prize for African scientists. The award has long been delayed because of its association with Equatorial Guinea's dictator, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo.
Once named after Obiang and originally thought to be funded by a foundation bearing his name, the award will now be called the UNESCO-Equatorial Guinea International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences. The $3 million endowment backing it will come directly from the African nation's government.
Since the idea for the award first emerged in 2010, scientists and human rights groups protesting Obiang's regime have sought to block the proposed honor. At the same time, many African countries believe that the prize would boost recognition of the continent's research. Caught in the middle of this fight, UNESCO had delayed a final decision on the prize several times. This week's vote was also in question after an internal legal opinion challenging the award became public.
Maria Vicien-Milburn, director of UNESCO's legal office, concluded that the change in the source of funding for the award violated preexisting rules UNESCO had established for named prizes. Simply changing the honor's name was not an option, she argued. But in a 33-18 vote yesterday, with seven abstentions, UNESCO's Executive Board approved the renamed prize.
The saga may not be over. Human rights groups have already called for Irina Bokova, UNESCO's director general, to block implementation of the prize. Bokova has said she will seek further legal counsel.