- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Flu Research Moratorium Should Continue, Fauci Says
26 April 2012 5:36 pm
Although the contention over whether to publish two controversial H5N1 avian influenza studies appears to be waning, researchers should continue to abide by a voluntary moratorium on certain types of studies involving the virus, a senior U.S. science official said today.
There should be "an extension on the moratorium," which was originally supposed to expire on 20 March, Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) told a U.S. Senate panel today. "The question is for how long."
The comments came at a hearing held by the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs into the risk posed by "dual use" research that carries both benefits and risks. The hearing was prompted, in large part, by the H5N1 controversy, said Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), the chair of the panel. "Although this particular issue appears to have been resolved, it's going to recur and we can't just 'kick this can down the road' and deal with it on an ad hoc basis when it happens again."
Four witnesses, including Fauci, discussed the process that led to a decision by the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to support publication of the two papers, and new U.S. government rules designed to identify taxpayer-funded dual use research of concern before it begins. They also responded to criticism of the NSABB process by one of the panel's members, Michael Osterholm of the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, in a letter first obtained by ScienceInsider.
Look for more details on the hearing tomorrow on ScienceInsider.