- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
U.S. to Seek University Input on New Dual Use Reviews
1 May 2012 4:42 pm
The U.S. government will soon be asking university officials to comment on how best to implement recently released dual use research rules at the university level, a senior U.S. science official announced today.
"What needs to be ironed out and will be ironed out is how [dual use reviews are] sorted out at the institutional level," Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), said at a workshop sponsored by the National Academies in Washington, D.C.
The announcement marks the latest U.S. response to the controversy over a pair of studies that show how to make the H5N1 avian influenza virus transmissible in mammals. On 29 March, the government released a new policy that requires federal agencies that fund unclassified research to systematically review the potential risks of studies involving 15 "high consequence" pathogens and toxins, including H5N1. The reviews are designed to reduce the risks associated with dual use research of concern (DURC) that could be used for good or harm. The policy also requires the funders, scientists, and institutions to work together to develop plans for mitigating risk, including possibly altering the research or withholding research results.
At the time, Fauci and other officials made it clear that although the new policy applied to only federal agencies, they expected that academic institutions and individual scientists funded by the government would play a growing role in DURC reviews. In particular, past recommendations from a variety of expert panels have suggested that university institutional biosafety committees (IBCs), originally established to oversee the safety of studies involving recombinant DNA techniques, take a bigger role in helping to identify DURC studies before they begin.
Fauci did not discuss the details of the new policy, which he said should be released for public comment "soon." But he said officials will be seeking input on what university-level review practices would be "practical and impractical. ... We don't want to have a government policy that can't be implemented. … What we are talking about is the path forward."
University groups have expressed concerns about how the new DURC policy will be implemented and how disagreements between scientists and the government might be resolved. Fauci has said that he expects "a lot of constructive conversation" about the new rules.