- News Home
6 March 2014 1:04 pm ,
Vol. 343 ,
Magdalena Koziol, a former postdoc at Yale University, was the victim of scientific sabotage. Now, she is suing the...
Antiretroviral drugs can protect people from becoming infected by HIV. But so-called pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP...
Two studies show that eating a diet low in protein and high in carbohydrates is linked to a longer, healthier life, and...
Considered an icon of conservation science, researchers at World Wildlife Fund (WWF) headquarters in Washington, D.C.,...
The new atlas, which shows the distribution of important trace metals and other substances, is the first product of...
Early in April, the first of a fleet of environmental monitoring satellites will lift off from Europe's spaceport in...
Since 2000, U.S. government health research agencies have spent almost $1 billion on an effort to churn out thousands...
- 6 March 2014 1:04 pm , Vol. 343 , #6175
- About Us
ScienceShot: Are Major Earthquakes Linked?
2 August 2012 12:44 pm
Two of the six largest quakes since 1900—the magnitude-8.8 temblor that rocked Chile in February 2010, and the 9.0 quake that slammed Japan in March 2011 (damage shown)—occurred just 13 months apart. What's more, a group of four major shocks around the Pacific Rim in the early 1960s occurred within the span of 57 months. Coincidence? Probably, say researchers who analyzed the spacing of temblors with a magnitude of 8.3 or greater that occurred from 1900 through 2011. The chance of two such quakes occurring within 1 year of each other was 9.5%, the researchers report today in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. That's about the same chances of duplicating any particular arrangement of quakes, the researchers say—even a pattern with widely scattered shocks that isn't particularly remarkable. After comparing the actual pattern of temblors in the past 111 years with hundreds of patterns generated by three different statistical distributions, the team says there's no compelling evidence that major quakes are linked. So next time a big quake happens somewhere in the world, rest easy: It doesn't bode ill for your local fault zone.
See more ScienceShots.