- News Home
6 March 2014 1:04 pm ,
Vol. 343 ,
Magdalena Koziol, a former postdoc at Yale University, was the victim of scientific sabotage. Now, she is suing the...
Antiretroviral drugs can protect people from becoming infected by HIV. But so-called pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP...
Two studies show that eating a diet low in protein and high in carbohydrates is linked to a longer, healthier life, and...
Considered an icon of conservation science, researchers at World Wildlife Fund (WWF) headquarters in Washington, D.C.,...
The new atlas, which shows the distribution of important trace metals and other substances, is the first product of...
Early in April, the first of a fleet of environmental monitoring satellites will lift off from Europe's spaceport in...
Since 2000, U.S. government health research agencies have spent almost $1 billion on an effort to churn out thousands...
- 6 March 2014 1:04 pm , Vol. 343 , #6175
- About Us
Future U.S. Fusion Research Should Keep Options Open, Report Concludes
20 February 2013 4:00 pm
The United States should embark on a coordinated national research program into inertial confinement fusion—but only after researchers successfully demonstrate the scientific basis of the technology by creating a burning plasma in the laboratory, an expert panel assembled by the U.S. National Academies recommends in a report released today. That conclusion will pile the pressure on the National Ignition Facility (NIF), the $3.5 billion laser fusion project at the government's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. NIF, which was completed in 2009, was supposed to have achieved ignition—a burning plasma that produces at least as much energy as it consumes—by last year. Having missed that deadline, however, NIF is now awaiting a decision from Congress about its future funding. In the meantime, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) asked the National Academies to explore what steps the United States should take to develop fusion power if NIF does eventually achieve ignition.
Fusion aims to generate power by melding light nuclei together to make larger ones, a process during which some of the nuclear mass is converted into energy. But creating fusion requires temperatures of more than 50 million°C and huge pressures. Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) seeks to create those conditions by taking a tiny capsule of fusion fuel (typically a mixture of the hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium) and crushing it at high speed using some form of "driver," such as lasers, particle beams, or magnetic pulses.
ICF has received piecemeal funding over the years from a variety of sources, but the majority has come from DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which manages nuclear weapons. For nearly 2 decades, NNSA has supported the construction and operation of NIF because ICF's miniature explosions can aid weapons scientists who are trying to maintain the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile. NIF has become the world's flagship for ICF, and today's report says its ability to successfully create a burning plasma will be key to taking the next steps toward a prototype fusion power plant. "The achievement of ignition on NIF should be an important trigger for the government to decide if it should launch a national coordinated [inertial fusion energy] program," says committee co-chair Ronald Davidson of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory in New Jersey.
The Livermore lab has been heavily promoting its vision of the next step, dubbed Laser Inertial Fusion Energy (LIFE). But the NAS committee favors a broad-based program that would give equal billing to alternative laser-based approaches from the University of Rochester in New York and the Naval Research Laboratory, as well as a magnetic pulse system being explored by DOE's Sandia National Laboratory and a particle beam system from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "If the government decides to go ahead, there should be a well thought out program to test approaches at the appropriate scale," Davidson says. "But if a particular approach proves too expensive [to be commercial], one should be prepared to take it off at the next exit ramp."
DOE's existing ICF program is already under pressure to broaden its scope because of the difficulty that NIF is having getting to ignition. The proposal before Congress seeks funding to also pursue magnetic pulse fusion at Sandia and the rival laser technique called polar direct drive, which would be performed on NIF. "We should do all we can to get more data on polar direct drive at NIF. It gets an order of magnitude more energy onto the target," says Robert McCrory, director of the Laboratory for Laser Energetics at the University of Rochester.
The report also highlights the fact that while ICF researchers have focused most of their effort on developing drivers and demonstrating ignition, other areas of research essential to commercial exploitation have received less attention. These include reaction chambers that can withstand repeated blasts for years on end, lasers that can fire high-energy pulses many times per second, and techniques to manufacture the tiny target capsules—a commercial plant may use more than a million per day. "To keep the cost of electricity low, there will need to be an R&D program to demonstrate the technology to manufacture targets on an industrial scale cost-effectively," Davidson says.
It is unlikely, however, that such a program would start any time soon. Funding for fusion in general is extremely tight because of general government budget-cutting and the high cost of the ITER fusion reactor project in France, of which the United States is a partner. (ITER uses a different approach, called magnetic confinement fusion.) Nevertheless, ICF researchers would very much like to hear that starting pistol from NIF. "Until you demonstrate ignition, you don't have a path to energy," McCrory says.
*Clarification 11:20 a.m., 21 February: Davidson thinks "the achievement of ignition on NIF should be an important trigger for the government to decide if it should launch a national coordinated [inertial fusion energy]," not an ICF program, as initially reported.