- News Home
12 December 2013 1:00 pm ,
Vol. 342 ,
The iconic 125-year-old Lick Observatory on Mount Hamilton near San Jose, California, is facing the threat of closure...
Recent results from the Curiosity Mars rover have helped scientists formulate a plan for the next phase of its mission...
A new, remarkably powerful drug that cripples the hepatitis C virus (HCV) came to market last week, but it sells for $...
In pretoothbrush populations, gumlines would often be marred by a thick, visible crust of calcium phosphate, food...
Evolutionary biologists have long studied how the Mexican tetra, a drab fish that lives in rivers and creeks but has...
Victorian astronomers spent countless hours laboriously charting the positions of stars in the sky. Such sky mapping,...
In an ambitious project to study 1000 years of sickness and health, researchers are excavating the graveyard of the now...
Stefan Behnisch has won awards for designing science labs and other buildings that are smart, sustainable, and...
- 12 December 2013 1:00 pm , Vol. 342 , #6164
- About Us
Don't Trust the Applause
18 June 2013 7:30 pm
The next time you hear extended applause for a performance you didn't think was that great, don't feel like a snob. A new study reveals that audience response has more to do with the people in the seats than those up on stage.
Applause is a bit like a pandemic, according to previous research. It begins with a few individuals and then catches on with more and more people until everyone is "infected." And as the applause dies down, the pandemic disappears. But researchers didn't fully understand the dynamics of what happens in the audience.
Enter Richard Mann, a mathematician at Uppsala University in Sweden. He and colleagues filmed groups of 13 to 20 students at the University of Leeds who were clapping after a number of different oral presentations by undergraduate and postgraduate students. Then the team took the videos back to the lab and analyzed them.
Applause, it turns out, is a bit like peer pressure. Individuals were more likely to start clapping if a larger percentage of the audience had already started, Mann's group reports online today in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface. If 50% of the audience was clapping, for example, individuals were 10 times more likely to start clapping than if 5% of the audience was clapping. People stop clapping for the same reason.
Mann and colleagues made a couple of other interesting observations. People decided to start or stop clapping not based on what they saw, but rather on what they heard. You don't have to witness the people clapping to become infected, Mann says; you just have to hear them.
Even more surprising, the applause for a bad presentation could be just as long as applause for a good one. "You should be careful about interpreting how good a talk is depending on how long the applause was," Mann says. Random interactions in the audience can result in very different lengths of applause regardless of the quality of the talk.
Other studies have shown that high-risk actions like booing can depend on a tipping point: A certain number of people have to start doing it before the momentum picks up and the rate at which people join in increases. There was no similar threshold with applause, Mann says. Even though individuals were more likely to clap when they heard others doing so, there was no minimum number of people clapping that suddenly caused a huge surge in participants.
Jon Kleinberg, a computer scientist at Cornell University, applauds the study. "It's an interesting way of measuring a kind of human dynamic process that takes place over a short window of time," he says. Kleinberg also notes that applause is a unique social behavior to study because people are immediately aware of what everyone else around them is doing. So remember that the next time you put your hands together.