- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Trees Exacerbate Forest Smog
16 October 2002 (All day)
KINGS BEACH, CALIFORNIA--Gases released by industry and trees combine in a noxious cocktail that produces damaging ozone in California forests, according to a study presented here on 9 October at the Sierra Science Symposium. The research illustrates the unpredictable consequences of atmospheric pollution.
Ozone is a major component of smog, which damages the lungs. It's even worse for the health of trees such as ponderosa and Jeffrey pines, the dominant species in the Sierra Nevada mountains of California and staples of the timber industry. Some experts believe that ozone might be affecting the majority of the Sierra Nevada. And damage is likely to worsen as the climate becomes warmer, hiking ozone levels in the lower atmosphere. Vehicles, industry, and agriculture are widely blamed for releasing nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons that waft into the mountains and, in a series of oxidation reactions, produce ozone.
The new research adds a surprising twist: A natural hydrocarbon called isoprene from oak trees in the foothills reacts with the rising, wind-borne nitrogen oxides, producing about half of the ozone in the Sierras. That reaction produces various byproducts. By measuring the concentration of these byproducts, a team led by atmospheric chemist Allen Goldstein and undergraduate Gabrielle Dreyfus of the University of California, Berkeley, determined how much ozone the trees produced. They found that isoprene accounts for 40% to 70% of ozone production in the forest. Such reactions are likely wherever forests are downwind of industrial pollution, says Goldstein, who reported the findings. The study is also published in the October 2002 issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research—Atmospheres.
The research is "of considerable importance," says atmospheric chemist Chris Geron of the Environmental Protection Agency in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Natural isoprene bumps forest ozone up to concentrations thought to reduce pine tree growth and endanger the health of people with respiratory problems, he says. But don't go reaching for your chainsaw just yet. "The solution is not to cut down all the trees," Goldstein says, "but to cut back on nitrogen oxide emissions."