- News Home
6 March 2014 1:04 pm ,
Vol. 343 ,
Antiretroviral drugs can protect people from becoming infected by HIV. But so-called pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP...
Two studies show that eating a diet low in protein and high in carbohydrates is linked to a longer, healthier life, and...
Considered an icon of conservation science, researchers at World Wildlife Fund (WWF) headquarters in Washington, D.C.,...
The new atlas, which shows the distribution of important trace metals and other substances, is the first product of...
Early in April, the first of a fleet of environmental monitoring satellites will lift off from Europe's spaceport in...
Since 2000, U.S. government health research agencies have spent almost $1 billion on an effort to churn out thousands...
Magdalena Koziol, a former postdoc at Yale University, was the victim of scientific sabotage. Now, she is suing the...
- 6 March 2014 1:04 pm , Vol. 343 , #6175
- About Us
The Incredible Shrinking Cod
31 January 2007 (All day)
For Atlantic cod, overfishing is the bad gift that keeps on giving. Once a mainstay of fishing fleets, cod began to thin out in the 1960s. Today, their numbers--and the fish themselves--remain small, despite a moratorium on fishing established in 1993. Now, a study of the Gulf of St. Lawrence in Canada might explain why. Researchers report that because the largest and fastest-growing fish were harvested, cod have evolved to grow slowly--an adaptation that haunts them to this day.
The average size of young adult cod has decreased by about 20% in the last 3 decades. Lab experiments have shown that harvesting mainly large fish will cause average size to shrink (ScienceNOW, 5 July 2004). But in the wild, other factors can also influence size, such as temperature and population density.
To control for these variables, Douglas Swain, a fisheries biologist at the Gulf Fisheries Center in Moncton, Canada, and colleagues looked back over data on fishing intensity, cod population, fish size, and environmental variables from 1977 to 1997. Temperatures were warm, which should have stimulated growth, and prey was abundant. So why didn't the cod recover to full size? The team found that the change in average length of 4-year-old cod correlated with the size selection exerted on their parents--which suggests that younger generations inherited their small size from small parents, because larger fish had been caught. This makes sense, Swain says; slow-growing fish would have an advantage, as they have a greater chance of reproducing before they're caught in nets.
"It is the best demonstration that the growth rates of fish themselves have been reduced in this stock," says David Conover of Stony Brook University in New York. "This nails it." But not everyone is convinced. "I am a real skeptic of this result," says Ray Hilborn of the University of Washington, Seattle. Hilborn has analyzed 73 fish stocks and found no relationship between fishing intensity and growth rate. Swain says that the impact could vary depending on fishing methods and the nature of the fish stock. Although the strong selection pressure of fishing can quickly slow down growth rate, he says, it will likely take much longer for nature to speed it up again.