- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
Since arriving on the island of Guam in the 1940s, the brown tree snake ( Boiga irregularis ) has extirpated native...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
The Hunter and the Hunted
29 May 2002 (All day)
SALT LAKE CITY--Bacteria are masters of disguise: Their ability to put on a variety of faces helps them evade immune responses and thwart the best efforts of drug designers. For years, researchers assumed that their hosts' immune systems had spurred the evolution of this flexibility. But that might not always be the case. New research shows that Salmonella bacteria might have developed their ability to change to help foil amoebae that are out to devour them.
Salmonella enterica causes food poisoning in a number of animals, including humans, cows, and pigs. These hosts' immune systems identify the bacteria by the sugars coating their cell membranes. The bacteria can change their coats--and this would enable them to reinfect an animal previously exposed to Salmonella. But they don't. Puzzlingly, bacteria with the same coat can easily reinfect the same animal. A possible explanation, reasoned evolutionary biologist Jeffrey Lawrence of the University of Pittsburgh, is that natural Salmonella predators in the animals' guts, such as amoebae, exert a stronger pressure than the immune system exerts.
To test this idea, Lawrence and colleagues lined up two feasts for predatory amoeba in a petri dish: rows of two Salmonella strains with different sugar coatings. The amoeba devoured one strain faster than the other. When tested with seven different Salmonella strains, the amoeba ate the tastiest Salmonella 2.5 times faster than the least attractive one, Lawrence reported here on 21 May at the general meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Apparently the sugar coat makes all the difference.
Next, Lawrence's team isolated amoeboid predators from frogs, insects, and other animals and discovered that each preferred a very specific type of sugar coating on their Salmonella. That suggests that the bugs might present the least tasty option in order to survive among the predators in any particular host, Lawrence says. If this turns out to be true, he says, the most important evolutionary pressure on Salmonella might not come from the host but from the amoeba species it carries.
Geneticist John Roth of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City calls the work "really cool." It shows that when studying infectious agents, researchers shouldn't just think about their interactions with humans. "We need to think about these bacteria as they really live, in soil and all over," Roth says.
Jeffrey Lawrence's home page