- News Home
10 April 2014 11:44 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
The Pyrenean ibex, an impressive mountain goat that lived in the central Pyrenees in Spain, went extinct in 2000. But a...
Tight budgets are forcing NASA to consider turning off one or more planetary science projects that have completed their...
Ebola is not a stranger to West Africa—an outbreak in the 1990s killed chimpanzees and sickened one researcher. But the...
In an as-yet-unpublished report, an international panel of geoscientists has concluded that a pair of deadly...
Tropical disease experts tried and failed before to eradicate yaws, a rare disfiguring disease of poor countries. Now,...
Since 2002, researchers have reported that agricultural communities in the hot and humid Pacific Coast of Central...
Balkan endemic kidney disease surfaced in the 1950s and for decades defied attempts to finger the cause. It occurred...
- 10 April 2014 11:44 am , Vol. 344 , #6180
- About Us
Holdren's Old Shop: Energy R&D Boost Strong But Not Enough
19 April 2010 1:48 pm
Harvard University's Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs has crunched the numbers on the Obama Administration's 2011 budget request for the Department of Energy and concluded that it gives short shrift to applied work. While lauding the proposed 12% boost to basic work in DOE's Office of Science, which concentrates on basic research, the report says:
The modest 7% proposed increase in applied energy RD&D spending is certainly needed, but remains well short of the large and sustained investment likely to be required to transform U.S. and global energy use and production and to meet the climate, energy availability, and energy security demands of the twenty-first century. In real terms, the support for basic and applied energy RD&D would remain 30% below the 1978 level, the peak of government funding for energy RD&D in the United States.
The report, from the center that John Holdren directed before becoming the president's science adviser, also calls for national labs to become more independent returning to the so-called government-owned, contractor-operated model (known as "GOCO") that it says worked well in the past. Labs may still legally be GOCO's by name, but the report laments what it calls "excessive micromanagement from DOE headquarters."