- News Home
5 December 2013 11:26 am ,
Vol. 342 ,
An animal rights group known as the Nonhuman Rights Project filed lawsuits in three New York courts this week in an...
Researchers have been hot on the trail of the elusive Denisovans, a type of ancient human known only by their DNA and...
Thousands of scientists in the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are about to lose their jobs as a result of the...
Dyslexia, a learning disability that hinders reading, hasn't been associated with deficits in vision, hearing, or...
Exotic, elusive, and dangerous, snakes have fascinated humankind for millennia. They can be hard to find, yet their...
Researchers have sequenced and analyzed the first two snake genomes, which represent two evolutionary extremes. The...
Snake venoms are remarkably complex mixtures that can stun or kill prey within minutes. But more and more researchers...
At age 30, Dutch biologist Freek Vonk has built up a respectable career as a snake scientist. But in his home country,...
- 5 December 2013 11:26 am , Vol. 342 , #6163
- About Us
AIDS Researchers Blast NIH Peer Review Plan
21 September 1999 7:00 pm
WASHINGTON, D.C.--A scheme to overhaul peer review at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is drawing intense fire from the AIDS community. Complaints from patient activists and scientists have been piling up for the past 2 weeks at NIH's Center for Scientific Review (CSR), which is considering recommendations from a panel headed by Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences, to reshuffle the groups that rank grant applications (Science, 30 July, p. 666).
The Alberts committee suggested grouping peer review panels under broad areas of science rather than specific disease categories or research methods, as many are grouped now. For example, the panel proposed doing away with the existing category "AIDS and AIDS related research" and moving the seven study sections under this heading into new, more general science categories, such as immunology or behavioral processes.
One critic, Mario Stevenson, a virologist at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester, says: "I'm a firm believer in the old saying, 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.' ... And I think reviews in the AIDS area are working very well." He and other scientists have endorsed protest letters arguing that eliminating the AIDS-specific category would dilute expertise and lower the quality of peer review. Charles Carpenter of Brown University, chair of the council that advises the NIH Office of AIDS Research, has sent CSR a letter on behalf of council members warning that the proposed reform could expose grant proposals "to review by investigators lacking the appropriate knowledge of AIDS research."
CSR director Elvera Ehrenfeld says she was surprised by the angry response. She thinks AIDS researchers may be confused by "an unfortunate misunderstanding" that existing study sections would disappear. The AIDS panels would simply be placed in new groupings, she says. However, some of the criticism "may be valid," Ehrenfeld says, "and that's why we asked for comments," which are due at CSR by 15 October. Alberts also wants to dispel concern: "Clearly we need to explore with the AIDS researchers exactly what it is that bothers them and why."