- News Home
10 April 2014 11:44 am ,
Vol. 344 ,
Balkan endemic kidney disease surfaced in the 1950s and for decades defied attempts to finger the cause. It occurred...
The Pyrenean ibex, an impressive mountain goat that lived in the central Pyrenees in Spain, went extinct in 2000. But a...
Tight budgets are forcing NASA to consider turning off one or more planetary science projects that have completed their...
Ebola is not a stranger to West Africa—an outbreak in the 1990s killed chimpanzees and sickened one researcher. But the...
In an as-yet-unpublished report, an international panel of geoscientists has concluded that a pair of deadly...
Tropical disease experts tried and failed before to eradicate yaws, a rare disfiguring disease of poor countries. Now,...
Since 2002, researchers have reported that agricultural communities in the hot and humid Pacific Coast of Central...
- 10 April 2014 11:44 am , Vol. 344 , #6180
- About Us
Tweaking the Real World
22 February 2006 (All day)
Would you notice if the room around you gradually shrank to a quarter of its size? Perhaps not, according to a virtual reality experiment that suggests that we ignore what we see if it clashes with our assumptions about the everyday world.
When you think about the kind of calculations that are needed to judge the relative scale of things, it's amazing that looking around a room feels so effortless. At a glance, we can accurately judge the size of lamps and chairs no matter where they are. Such calculations are hard work even for a supercomputer, so our brains must be taking shortcuts. According to one theory, we gather only small amounts of visual data and base most of our perceived reality on prior assumptions. For example, we accurately size up a table as we approach it, but then assume it remains the same size thereafter.
To test just how deep our grasp of reality goes, neuroscientist Andrew Glennerster and colleagues at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom created a virtual reality world befitting Alice in Wonderland. By wearing a closed helmet with motion sensors and internal movie screens, people ambled through a room and viewed a red box floating in midair. Subjects then walked to the other side of the room to an equally sized box and were asked to guess how big it was relative to the first. But on the way over, the researchers caused the walls of the virtual room to either balloon or shrink by a factor of 4. They then asked people to judge the sizes of the boxes relative to each other.
Because people didn't notice that the room was changing size, they made wildly inaccurate judgments about the relative sizes of the boxes, the team reports 21 February in Current Biology. Glennerster says this reveals that our brains are so hardwired with assumptions about the world--for example, that rooms do not change size as you move through them--that we completely ignore what we actually see. On the practical end, the study may help software designers create more compelling virtual realities.
The findings are "very surprising," says John Porrill, a neuroscientist at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom, who experienced the virtual room for himself. But he cautions that the results "may say more about virtual reality than they do about our ordinary perception of reality" because of the lack of real-world details such as seeing one's own feet on the ground.