- News Home
27 November 2013 12:59 pm ,
Vol. 342 ,
Science has exposed a thriving academic black market in China involving shady agencies, corrupt scientists, and...
Paper-selling agencies flourish in the aura of reputable businesses. For some scientists, it may be difficult to tell...
The new head of the National Center for Science Education promises to "fight the good fight" against attacks on...
Analyses of the H7N9 strains isolated from four new cases show that the virus is evolving rapidly, heightening anxiety...
In 2009, Jack Szostak shared a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the role of telomeres, the end bits of...
Featuring the first lunar rover in 40 years, Chang'e-3 is seen as an important milestone on China's quest to send a...
Data collected by satellites and floating probes have chronicled a 2-decade rise in the temperature and thickness of a...
Cholesterol, the artery-clogging molecule that contributes to cardiovascular disease, has another nasty trick up its...
- 27 November 2013 12:59 pm , Vol. 342 , #6162
- About Us
NIH Defends Grant to Sanctioned Psychiatrist
13 August 2012 4:57 pm
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is defending its decision 3 months ago to award a research grant to Charles Nemeroff, the former Emory University psychiatrist who got into trouble for failing to tell his university about at least $1.2 million in consulting income from drug companies.
After Emory barred him from receiving grants for 2 years in December 2008, Nemeroff moved on to the University of Miami. In May, he won a 5-year, $401,675-a-year grant to study posttraumatic stress disorder. As reported today by the blog Pharmalot, NIH wrote Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) on 3 August in response to a query about the matter. One of Grassley's questions was why NIH had awarded the grant even though Nemeroff was being investigated by the Department of Health and Human Services’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the Department of Justice.
In a 3 August letter to Grassley, NIH Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak explains that OIG and Justice investigations are confidential and peer reviewers weren't told about the review. "Absent any finding by the OIG or other actionable grounds at this time to exclude Dr. Nemeroff, the NIH followed standard procedures," the letter says.
Tabak also explains that Nemeroff's proposal went through usual reviews for scientific and public health value and that NIH asked the University of Miami about potential conflicts of interest involving the research. The letter notes that the study doesn't involve testing drugs. It also says that Thomas Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health, who has historical ties to Nemeroff, recused himself from the review. "I want to assure you that all procedures have been followed carefully in the process of awarding this specific grant to the University of Miami," Tabak wrote.
As part of the documents it gave Grassley, NIH included a "talking points" memo indicating that NIH was ready for criticism. The memo describes which officials should respond to questions about the grant and includes information similar to that in the letter to Grassley. It also says that the total grant is $690,000 a year for 5 years for a study at two sites—the University of Miami and Emory.
11:40 a.m., 14 August: Due to concerns about possible misuse, the image of the handwritten signature on Lawrence Tabak's letter has been obscured.